The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The exploratory analysis of autocorrelation in animal‐movement studies
Abstract
Studies of animal movements have been popularized for many large and shy species by the increasing use of radio telemetry methods (VHF and GPS technologies). Data are collected with high sampling frequency, and consist of successive observations of the position of an individual animal. The statistical analysis of such data poses several problems due to the lack of independence of successive observations. However, the statistical description of the temporal autocorrelation between successive steps is rarely performed by ecologists studying the patterns of animals movements. The aim of this paper is to warn ecologists against the consequences of failing to consider this aspect. We discuss the various issues related to analyzing autocorrelated data, and show how the exploratory analysis of autocorrelation can both reveal important biological insights and help to improve the accuracy of movement models. We suggest some tools that can be used to measure, test, and adjust for temporal autocorrelation. A short ecological illustration is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Autocorrelation, spatial scale of movement, and mortality risk have well-established and fundamental importance in shaping movement patterns.
“For example, these models do not account for autocorrelation, spatial scale of movement, or mortality risk, despite the well-established and fundamental importance these factors have in shaping movement patterns5,35–37.”
From Connectivity modelling in conservation science: a comparative evaluation (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
These models do not account for autocorrelation, spatial scale of movement, or mortality risk.
“For example, these models do not account for autocorrelation, spatial scale of movement, or mortality risk, despite the well-established and fundamental importance these factors have in shaping movement patterns5,35–37.”
From Connectivity modelling in conservation science: a comparative evaluation (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 58
- 10.2307/1933949 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0030-1299.1999.12730.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01066.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1570-7458.2003.00083.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s004420051023 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10344-009-0284-1 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1008025827895 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jspi.2003.06.016 · DOI
- 10.2307/1938211 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00320819 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2008.10.002 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00227-005-1578-9 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00279.x · DOI
- 10.1093/oso/9780198522065.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.015 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jembe.2006.08.013 · DOI
- 10.2307/2529305 · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2113:TIOMAR]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Fisher N, 1996, Statistical analysis of circular data
- 10.1007/s00442-005-0122-4 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00902.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s10980-005-2075-8 · DOI
- 10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[844:UTCOMG]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2603:SMIETF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1142/4031 · DOI
- 10.1093/biomet/67.1.163 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00379695 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01554.x · DOI
- 10.2307/1939924 · DOI
- Legendre P, 1998, Numerical ecology
- 10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00725.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-5193(88)80028-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.12.002 · DOI
- 10.2307/1937543 · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2240:SUAMIH]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0800375105 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00610.x · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00377167 · DOI
- 10.1139/z06-115 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.009 · DOI
- 10.4257/oeco.2006.1001.07 · DOI
- 10.1002/env.636 · DOI
- 10.1086/424767 · DOI
- 10.2307/1939467 · DOI
- 10.4098/AT.arch.97-34 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01249.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60259-7 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00168178 · DOI
- 10.2307/1939170 · DOI
- 10.2307/3801388 · DOI
- Tukey J, 1977, Exploratory data analysis
- 10.2307/2682991 · DOI
- Turchin P, 1998, Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modeling population redistribution in plants and animals
- 10.1214/aoms/1177731677 · DOI
- 10.1214/aoms/1177731746 · DOI
- 10.1214/aoms/1177731358 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0801744105 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Suite of simple metrics reveals common movement syndromes across vertebrate taxa
Abrahms, B., Seidel, D. P., Dougherty, E., Hazen, E. L., Bograd, S. J., Wilson, A. M., Weldon McNutt, J., Costa, D. P., Blake, S., Brashares, J. S., et al. (2017) · Movement Ecology · doi:10.1186/s40462-017-0104-2 · Cited by 109
Connectivity modelling in conservation science: a comparative evaluation
Unnithan Kumar, S., & Cushman, S. A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-20370-w · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Dray, S., Royer‐Carenzi, M., & Calenge, C.
- Affiliations
- Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5558 43 boulevard du 11 novembre 1918 Villeurbanne France
- Evolution Biologique et Modélisation, case 5 Université de Provence, LATP, CNRS‐UMR 6632 Place Victor Hugo Marseille Cedex 3 13331 France
- Direction des études et de la recherche Office national de la chasse et de la faune sauvage Saint Benoist Auffargis 78610 France
- Venue
- Ecological Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-03-09
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 673-681
- ISSN
- 0912-3814
- 1440-1703
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review