Cited by 70

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The exploratory analysis of autocorrelation in animal‐movement studies

Dray, Stéphane, Royer‐Carenzi, Manuela, Calenge, Clément·2010·Ecological Research

Abstract

Studies of animal movements have been popularized for many large and shy species by the increasing use of radio telemetry methods (VHF and GPS technologies). Data are collected with high sampling frequency, and consist of successive observations of the position of an individual animal. The statistical analysis of such data poses several problems due to the lack of independence of successive observations. However, the statistical description of the temporal autocorrelation between successive steps is rarely performed by ecologists studying the patterns of animals movements. The aim of this paper is to warn ecologists against the consequences of failing to consider this aspect. We discuss the various issues related to analyzing autocorrelated data, and show how the exploratory analysis of autocorrelation can both reveal important biological insights and help to improve the accuracy of movement models. We suggest some tools that can be used to measure, test, and adjust for temporal autocorrelation. A short ecological illustration is presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11284-010-0701-7

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Autocorrelation, spatial scale of movement, and mortality risk have well-established and fundamental importance in shaping movement patterns.

    “For example, these models do not account for autocorrelation, spatial scale of movement, or mortality risk, despite the well-established and fundamental importance these factors have in shaping movement patterns5,35–37.”
  • These models do not account for autocorrelation, spatial scale of movement, or mortality risk.

    “For example, these models do not account for autocorrelation, spatial scale of movement, or mortality risk, despite the well-established and fundamental importance these factors have in shaping movement patterns5,35–37.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. 10.2307/1933949 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.0030-1299.1999.12730.x · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01066.x · DOI
  4. 10.1046/j.1570-7458.2003.00083.x · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s004420051023 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s10344-009-0284-1 · DOI
  7. 10.1023/A:1008025827895 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jspi.2003.06.016 · DOI
  9. 10.2307/1938211 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/BF00320819 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.017 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2008.10.002 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s00227-005-1578-9 · DOI
  14. 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00279.x · DOI
  15. 10.1093/oso/9780198522065.001.0001 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.015 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jembe.2006.08.013 · DOI
  18. 10.2307/2529305 · DOI
  19. 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2113:TIOMAR]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  20. Fisher N, 1996, Statistical analysis of circular data
  21. 10.1007/s00442-005-0122-4 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00902.x · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s10980-005-2075-8 · DOI
  24. 10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[844:UTCOMG]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  25. 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2603:SMIETF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  26. 10.1142/4031 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/biomet/67.1.163 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/BF00379695 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01554.x · DOI
  30. 10.2307/1939924 · DOI
  31. Legendre P, 1998, Numerical ecology
  32. 10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00725.x · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0022-5193(88)80028-6 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.12.002 · DOI
  35. 10.2307/1937543 · DOI
  36. 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2240:SUAMIH]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  37. 10.1073/pnas.0800375105 · DOI
  38. 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00610.x · DOI
  39. 10.1007/BF00377167 · DOI
  40. 10.1139/z06-115 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.009 · DOI
  42. 10.4257/oeco.2006.1001.07 · DOI
  43. 10.1002/env.636 · DOI
  44. 10.1086/424767 · DOI
  45. 10.2307/1939467 · DOI
  46. 10.4098/AT.arch.97-34 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01249.x · DOI
  48. 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60259-7 · DOI
  49. 10.1007/BF00168178 · DOI
  50. 10.2307/1939170 · DOI
  51. 10.2307/3801388 · DOI
  52. Tukey J, 1977, Exploratory data analysis
  53. 10.2307/2682991 · DOI
  54. Turchin P, 1998, Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modeling population redistribution in plants and animals
  55. 10.1214/aoms/1177731677 · DOI
  56. 10.1214/aoms/1177731746 · DOI
  57. 10.1214/aoms/1177731358 · DOI
  58. 10.1073/pnas.0801744105 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dray, S., Royer‐Carenzi, M., & Calenge, C.
Affiliations
  • Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5558 43 boulevard du 11 novembre 1918 Villeurbanne France
  • Evolution Biologique et Modélisation, case 5 Université de Provence, LATP, CNRS‐UMR 6632 Place Victor Hugo Marseille Cedex 3 13331 France
  • Direction des études et de la recherche Office national de la chasse et de la faune sauvage Saint Benoist Auffargis 78610 France
Venue
Ecological Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03-09
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
673-681
ISSN
  • 0912-3814
  • 1440-1703
Cited by
70
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review