Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing bee species richness in two Mediterranean communities: importance of habitat type and sampling techniques

Open access
Nielsen, Anders, Steffan‐Dewenter, Ingolf, Westphal, Catrin, Messinger, Olivia, Potts, Simon G., Roberts, Stuart P. M., Settele, Josef, Szentgyörgyi, Hajnalka, Vaissière, Bernard E., Vaitis, Michalis, Woyciechowski, Michal, Bazos, Ioannis, Biesmeijer, Jacobus C., Bommarco, Riccardo, Kunin, William E., Tscheulin, Thomas, Lamborn, Ellen, Petanidou, Theodora·2011·Ecological Research

Abstract

The decline of bees has raised concerns regarding their conservation and the maintenance of ecosystem services they provide to bee‐pollinated wild flowers and crops. Although the Mediterranean region is a hotspot for bee species richness, their status remains poorly studied. There is an urgent need for cost‐effective, reliable, and unbiased sampling methods that give good bee species richness estimates. This study aims: (a) to assess bee species richness in two common Mediterranean habitat types: semi‐natural scrub (phrygana) and managed olive groves; (b) to compare species richness in those systems to that of other biogeographic regions, and (c) to assess whether six different sampling methods (pan traps, variable and standardized transect walks, observation plots and trap nests), previously tested in other European biogeographic regions, are suitable in Mediterranean communities. Eight study sites, four per habitat type, were selected on the island of Lesvos, Greece. The species richness observed was high compared to other habitat types worldwide for which comparable data exist. Pan traps collected the highest proportion of the total bee species richness across all methods at the scale of a study site. Variable and standardized transect walks detected the highest total richness over all eight study sites. Trap nests and observation plots detected only a limited fraction of the bee species richness. To assess the total bee species richness in bee diversity hotspots, such as the studied habitats, we suggest a combination of transect walks conducted by trained bee collectors and pan trap sampling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11284-011-0852-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Nielsen, A., Steffan‐Dewenter, I., Westphal, C., Messinger, O., Potts, S. G., Roberts, S. P. M., Settele, J., Szentgyörgyi, H., Vaissière, B. E., Vaitis, M., Woyciechowski, M., Bazos, I., Biesmeijer, J. C., Bommarco, R., Kunin, W. E., Tscheulin, T., Lamborn, E., & Petanidou, T.
Venue
Ecological Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-18
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
969-983
ISSN
  • 0912-3814 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1703
OpenAlex
W2016579990
Cited by
177
References
2
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing bee species richness in two Mediterranean communities: importance of habitat type and sampling techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11284-011-0852-1
The paper
Nielsen, A., Steffan‐Dewenter, I., Westphal, C., Messinger, O., Potts, S. G., Roberts, S. P. M., Settele, J., Szentgyörgyi, H., Vaissière, B. E., Vaitis, M., Woyciechowski, M., Bazos, I., Biesmeijer, J. C., Bommarco, R., Kunin, W. E., Tscheulin, T., Lamborn, E., & Petanidou, T. (2011). Assessing bee species richness in two Mediterranean communities: importance of habitat type and sampling techniques. Ecological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-011-0852-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.