Senecio conrathii N.E.Br. (Asteraceae), a new hyperaccumulator of nickel from serpentinite outcrops of the Barberton Greenstone Belt, South Africa
Abstract
Abstract Five nickel hyperaccumulators belonging to the Asteraceae are known from ultramafic outcrops in South Africa. Phytoremediation applications of the known hyperaccumulators in the Asteraceae, such as the indigenous Berkheya coddii Roessler, are well reported and necessitate further exploration to find additional species with such traits. This study targeted the most frequently occurring species of the Asteraceae on eight randomly selected serpentinite outcrops of the Barberton Greenstone Belt. Twenty species were sampled, including 12 that were tested for nickel accumulation for the first time. Although the majority of the species were excluders, the known hyperaccumulators Berkheya nivea N.E.Br. and B. zeyheri (Sond. & Harv.) Oliv. & Hiern subsp. rehmannii (Thell.) Roessler var. rogersiana (Thell.) Roessler hyperaccumulated nickel in the leaves at expected levels. A new hyperaccumulator of nickel was discovered, Senecio conrathii N.E.Br., which accumulated the element in its leaves at 1695 ± 637 µg g −1 on soil with a total and exchangeable nickel content of 503 mg kg −1 and 0.095 µg g −1 , respectively. This makes it the third known species in the Senecioneae of South Africa to hyperaccumulate nickel after Senecio anomalochrous Hilliard and Senecio coronatus (Thunb.) Harv., albeit it being a weak accumulator compared with the latter. Seven tribes in the Asteraceae have now been screened for hyperaccumulation in South Africa, with hyperaccumulators only recorded for the Arctoteae and Senecioneae. This suggests that further exploration for hyperaccumulators should focus on these tribes as they comprise all six species (of 68 Asteraceae taxa screened thus far) to hyperaccumulate nickel.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent Ni hyperaccumulator additions include Senecio conrathii and Phyllanthus rufuschaneyi.
“Recent Ni hyperaccumulator additions include Senecio conrathii and Phyllanthus rufuschaneyi (Bouman et al., 2018; Siebert et al., 2018).”
From Plant hyperaccumulators: a state-of-the-art review on mechanism of heavy metal transport and sequestration (2025) · cites this paper as Siebert et al., 2018
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Siebert, S. J., Schutte, N. C., Bester, S. P., Komape, D. M., & Rajakaruna, N.
- Affiliations
- North-West University (ZA)
- California Polytechnic State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Siebert, Stefan John
- ORCID
- Venue
- Ecological Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-11-28
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 651-658
- ISSN
- 0912-3814 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1703
- OpenAlex
- W2769927535
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 0.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecological Research (publishedVersion)
- DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Geographic Society
- Botanical Education Trust
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
- Keywords
- nickel hyperaccumulation, nickel hyperaccumulator, Asteraceae, serpentinite, Barberton Greenstone Belt, phytoremediation, Senecioneae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review