Long-term impact of family group conferences on re-offending: the Indianapolis restorative justice experiment
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Over time the effects of the Indiana restorative justice program disappear and no impacts on recidivism are detectable in the longer-run.
“However, overtime the effects disappear and no impacts on recidivism are detectable in the longer-run (Jeong et al., 2012).”
From Can Restorative Justice Conferencing Reduce Recidivism? Evidence From the Make-it-Right Program (2021) · cites this paper as Jeong et al., 2012
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 36 · Cited by 34
- Authors
- Jeong, S., McGarrell, E. F., & Hipple, N. K.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jeong, Seokjin
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Criminology
- Published
- 2012-06-26
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 369-385
- ISSN
- 1572-8315 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3750
- OpenAlex
- W2040159533
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 47.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
- Keywords
- family group conferences, restorative justice, juvenile recidivism, juvenile offenders, long-term follow-up, juvenile arrests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
