Imagining violent criminals: an experimental investigation of music stereotypes and character judgments
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
What is fictional or literary is (mis)judged as factual or literal by legal penal professionals and jurors who are rarely conversant with the music's genre norms.
“As such, what is fictional or literary is (mis)judged as factual or literal by legal penal professionals and jurors who are rarely conversant with the music's genre norms (Fried, 1999; Dunbar and Kubrin, 2018; Stoia et al ., 2018; Nielson and Dennis, 2019).”
From Copping the blame: the role of YouTube videos in the criminalisation of UK drill music (2022) · cites this paper as Dunbar and Kubrin, 2018
The arguments that such cases are usually based on involve a matter-of-factly presentation of drill-related material without adequately interrogating the artistic, literary or fictional nature of the 'evidence' brought before judges and jurors.
“The arguments that such cases are usually based on involve a matter-of-factly presentation of drill-related material - without adequately interrogating the artistic, literary or fictional nature of the 'evidence' that is brought before judges and jurors.”
From Copping the blame: the role of YouTube videos in the criminalisation of UK drill music (2022) · cites this paper as Dunbar and Kubrin, 2018
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 101 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Dunbar, A., & Kubrin, C. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Delaware (US)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kubrin, Charis E.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Criminology
- Published
- 2018-10-25
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 507-528
- ISSN
- 1572-8315 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3750
- OpenAlex
- W2898278480
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 101
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- escholarship.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Criminology (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Jury Decision Making Processes
- Keywords
- rap lyrics, character assessment, racial bias, racial disparities in criminal justice, country music, heavy metal music, songwriters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
