Examining the effects of teen dating violence prevention programs: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Meta-analyses have found adolescent dating violence prevention programs can reduce sexual violence, increase knowledge, and foster prosocial attitudes.
“Meta-analyses have found adolescent dating violence prevention pro grams can reduce sexual violence, increase knowledge, and foster prosocial attitudes (Lee & Wong, 2022; Russell, Voith, & Lee, 2021).”
From Child sexual abuse by different classes and types of perpetrator: Prevalence and trends from an Australian national survey (2024) · cites this paper as Lee & Wong, 2022
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 136 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Lee, C., & Wong, J. S.
- Affiliations
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Wong, Jennifer S.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Criminology
- Published
- 2020-09-25
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-40
- ISSN
- 1572-8315 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3750
- OpenAlex
- W3016483054
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 136
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2021-03-24)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Keywords
- dating violence, prevention programs, adolescents, knowledge, attitudes, bystander behavior, perpetration, victimization, program effectiveness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
