Nonprofit capacity and social performance: Mapping the field and future directions
Open accessAbstract
Nonprofit organizations are critical actors in the Sustainable Development Goals as they provide a wide range of social services to the community and contribute to creating a sustainable future. They must compete for funding or government contracts by showing high social performance. Among the top factors influencing social performance is capacity, and it has received considerable attention in public and nonprofit literature. Capacity refers to the resources, capabilities, and practices required to perform their functions to achieve the social mission and high social performance. However, studies concerning capacity linked with social performance remain controversial. Understanding the linkage between capacity and social performance is relevant to funders, board directors, and management as it helps them enhance organizational performance. This research aims to assess the flow of knowledge in the study field and make recommendations for future research. The study focuses on capacity of nonprofits and thoroughly reviews the literature using complementary bibliometric analysis: co-occurrence analysis of keywords, sources, and authors and bibliographic coupling analysis of documents. We conduct a systematic analysis of peer-reviewed journal articles published between 1955 and 2022. Seven significant themes emerge among the most prominent researchers: (1) the link between capacity and social performance; (2) dimensions of capacity; (3) human resource capacity linked with social performance: (4) financial capacity linked with social performance; (5) capacity building linked with social performance; (6) collaboration and capacity; and (7) factors affecting capacity–social performance. The literature on nonprofits is determined to have inconsistent findings regarding the relationship between capacity and social performance. Research on various factors influencing capacity–social performance relationships is also scarce. This article highlights major principles in the discipline and identifies significant theoretical gaps in the body of knowledge. It also outlines the conceptual foundation for the study and makes recommendations for further research. From a managerial standpoint, the study sheds light on whether capacity is linked to higher performance levels and provides policymakers with guidelines on the implications of capacity building and collaboration.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The lack of diagnostic and decision-support tools constrains NPOs' ability to strategically plan, implement, and evaluate sustainability-aligned initiatives, ultimately undermining organizational resilience and long-term societal impact.
“This limitation constrains their ability to strategically plan, implement, and evaluate sustainability-aligned initiatives, ultimately undermining organizational resilience and long-term societal impact [19].”
From Sustainable Value Creation in Nonprofit Organizations: Processes, Determinants, and Strategic Dimensions (2026) · cites this paper as [19]
The Current trend analysis says nonprofits’ limited policy-development and decision-making capabilities make them less effective in environmental governance; it also links capacity to disaster resilience and social performance. It does not identify a lack of diagnostic or decision-support tools or establish that such a lack prevents planning, implementation, and evaluation of sustainability initiatives and thereby undermines long-term societal impact. The indexed passages provide section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 186 · Cited by 52
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Azam SMF Yajid MS Tham J Hamid JA Khatibi A Johar MGM Ariffin IA Research methodology: building research skills 2021 1 Malaysia McGraw-Hill Education
- Banjongprasert A Understanding the adaptive capacity of actors in environmental governance: the case of transboundary movement of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) Croat Int Relat Rev 2022 28 89 62 89 10.2478/CIRR-2022-0004 · DOI
- Brown W Board Development practices and competent board members Nonprofit Manag Leadersh 2007 17 3 301 317 10.1002/nml · DOI
- Campbell D Lambright K Struggling to get it right: performance measurement challenges and strategies for addressing them among funders of human services Nonprofit Manag Leadersh 2017 27 3 335 351 10.1002/nml · DOI
- Daniel J Moulton S Beyond cans and capacity: nonprofit roles and service network objectives in an emergency food network Nonprofit Manag Leadersh 2017 10.1002/nml · DOI
- Fowler A (1996) Assessing NGO Performance: difficulties, Dilemmas and a Way Ahead. In: Non-Governmental Organisations: performance and accountability beyond the magic bullet (1995): 143- (In Non-gov, pp. 143–156). London: Earthscan
- Mitchell G Berlan D Evaluation and evaluative rigor in the nonprofit sector Nonprofit Manag Leadersh 2016 10.1002/nml · DOI
- Polat RK Lowndes V How does multi-level governance create capacity to address refugee needs, and with what limitations? An analysis of municipal responses to Syrian refugees in Istanbul J Refugee Stud 2022 35 1 51 73 10.1093/jrs/feab1 · DOI
- Shumate M Cooper K Piny A Pena-y-lillo M The nonprofit capacities instrument Nonprofit Manag Leadersh 2017 10.1002/nml · DOI
- Teece D Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance Strateg Manag J 2007 28 1 43 10.1002/smj · DOI
- Authors
- Nordin, N., Khatibi, A., & Azam, S. M. F.
- Affiliations
- Management and Science University (MY)
- Corresponding author
- Nordin, Norraini
- Venue
- Management Review Quarterly
- Published
- 2022-09-27
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 171-225
- ISSN
- 2198-1620 (ISSN-L)
- 2198-1639
- PMC
- PMC9513309
- OpenAlex
- W4297362481
- Semantic Scholar
- 221371b1e7d9935eda1dce8160d945f2fdc5a74d
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 186
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 14.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Management Review Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Community Development and Social Impact
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Keywords
- nonprofit organizations, organizational capacity, social performance, capacity building, human resource capacity, financial capacity, collaboration, Sustainable Development Goals, nonprofit funding, research gaps
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review