The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PSMA-Based [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT Is Superior to Conventional Imaging for Lesion Detection in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Open accessAbstract
PurposeCurrent standard of care conventional imaging modalities (CIM) such as X-ray computed tomography (CT) and bone scan can be limited for detection of metastatic prostate cancer and therefore improved imaging methods are an unmet clinical need. We evaluated the utility of a novel second-generation low molecular weight radiofluorinated prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracer, [18F]DCFPyL, in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.ProceduresNine patients with suspected prostate cancer recurrence, eight with CIM evidence of metastatic prostate cancer and one with biochemical recurrence, were imaged with [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT. Eight of the patients had contemporaneous CIM for comparison. A lesion-by-lesion comparison of the detection of suspected sites of metastatic prostate cancer was carried out between PET and CIM. Statistical analysis for estimated proportions of inter-modality agreement for detection of metastatic disease was calculated accounting for intra-patient correlation using general estimating equation (GEE) intercept-only regression models.ResultsOne hundred thirty-nine sites of PET positive [18F]DCFPyL uptake (138 definite, 1 equivocal) for metastatic disease were detected in the eight patients with available comparison CIM. By contrast, only 45 lesions were identified on CIM (30 definite, 15 equivocal). When lesions were negative or equivocal on CIM, it was estimated that a large portion of these lesions or 0.72 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.55–0.84) would be positive on [18F]DCFPyL PET. Conversely, of those lesions negative or equivocal on [18F]DCFPyL PET, it was estimated that only a very small proportion or 0.03 (95 % CI 0.01–0.07) would be positive on CIM. Delayed 2-h-post-injection time point PET yielded higher tumor radiotracer uptake and higher tumor-to-background ratios than an earlier 1-h-post-injection time point.ConclusionsA novel PSMA-targeted PET radiotracer, [18F]DCFPyL, was able to a large number of suspected sites of prostate cancer, many of which were occult or equivocal by CIM. This study provides strong preliminary evidence for the use of this second-generation PSMA-targeted PET radiotracer for detection of metastatic prostate cancer and lends further support for the importance of PSMA-targeted PET imaging in prostate cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models
LIANG, K.-Y., & ZEGER, S. L. (1986) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/73.1.13 · Cited by 18,550
Siegel, R., Ma, J., Zou, Z., & Jemal, A. (2014) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21208 · Cited by 11,499
Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Colon: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Park, P. Y., Goldin, T., Chang, J., Markman, M., & Kundranda, M. N. (2015) · Case Reports in Oncology · doi:10.1159/000441772 · Cited by 5,273
Eiber, M., Maurer, T., Souvatzoglou, M., Beer, A. J., Ruffani, A., Haller, B., Graner, F.-P., Kübler, H., Haberhorn, U., Eisenhut, M., et al. (2015) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.115.154153 · Cited by 994
Afshar-Oromieh, A., Zechmann, C. M., Malcher, A., Eder, M., Eisenhut, M., Linhart, H. G., Holland-Letz, T., Hadaschik, B. A., Giesel, F. L., Debus, J., et al. (2014) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-013-2525-5 · Cited by 921
Afshar-Oromieh, A., Malcher, A., Eder, M., Eisenhut, M., Linhart, H. G., Hadaschik, B. A., Holland-Letz, T., Giesel, F. L., Kratochwil, C., Haufe, S., et al. (2013) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-012-2298-2 · Cited by 915
Upregulation of prostate-specific membrane antigen after androgen-deprivation therapy
Wright, G. L., Mayer Grob, B., Haley, C., Grossman, K., Newhall, K., Petrylak, D., Troyer, J., Konchuba, A., Schellhammer, P. F., & Moriarty, R. (1996) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00184-7 · Cited by 635
Morigi, J. J., Stricker, P. D., van Leeuwen, P. J., Tang, R., Ho, B., Nguyen, Q., Hruby, G., Fogarty, G., Jagavkar, R., Kneebone, A., et al. (2015) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.115.160382 · Cited by 571
Ross, J. S., Sheehan, C. E., Fisher, H. A. �., Kaufman, R. P., Kaur, P., Gray, K., Webb, I. J., Gray, G. S., Mosher, R. E., & Kallakury, B. (2003) · PubMed · Cited by 502
Cited by
Eiber, M., Herrmann, K., Calais, J., Hadaschik, B., Giesel, F. L., Hartenbach, M., Hope, T., Reiter, R., Maurer, T., Weber, W. A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.117.198119 · Cited by 626
Rowe, S. P., Pienta, K. J., Pomper, M. G., & Gorin, M. A. (2018) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.117.195255 · Cited by 170
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rowe, S. P., Macura, K. J., Mena, E., Blackford, A. L., Nadal, R., Antonarakis, E. S., Eisenberger, M., Carducci, M., Fan, H., Dannals, R. F., Chen, Y., Mease, R. C., Szabo, Z., Pomper, M. G., & Cho, S. Y.
- Venue
- Molecular Imaging and Biology
- Published
- 2016-04-14
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 411-419
- ISSN
- 1536-1632 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-2002
- OpenAlex
- W2468071338
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 23.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PSMA-Based [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT Is Superior to Conventional Imaging for Lesion Detection in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11307-016-0957-6
- The paper
- Rowe, S. P., Macura, K. J., Mena, E., Blackford, A. L., Nadal, R., Antonarakis, E. S., Eisenberger, M., Carducci, M., Fan, H., Dannals, R. F., Chen, Y., Mease, R. C., Szabo, Z., Pomper, M. G., & Cho, S. Y. (2016). PSMA-Based [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT Is Superior to Conventional Imaging for Lesion Detection in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Molecular Imaging and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-016-0957-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.