Endocrine Disruptors in Bottled Mineral Water: Total Estrogenic Burden and Migration from Plastic Bottles
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND, AIM, AND SCOPE: Food consumption is an important route of human exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals. So far, this has been demonstrated by exposure modeling or analytical identification of single substances in foodstuff (e.g., phthalates) and human body fluids (e.g., urine and blood). Since the research in this field is focused on few chemicals (and thus missing mixture effects), the overall contamination of edibles with xenohormones is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the integrated estrogenic burden of bottled mineral water as model foodstuff and to characterize the potential sources of the estrogenic contamination. MATERIALS, METHODS, AND RESULTS: In the present study, we analyzed commercially available mineral water in an in vitro system with the human estrogen receptor alpha and detected estrogenic contamination in 60% of all samples with a maximum activity equivalent to 75.2 ng/l of the natural sex hormone 17beta-estradiol. Furthermore, breeding of the molluskan model Potamopyrgus antipodarum in water bottles made of glass and plastic [polyethylene terephthalate (PET)] resulted in an increased reproductive output of snails cultured in PET bottles. This provides first evidence that substances leaching from plastic food packaging materials act as functional estrogens in vivo. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate a widespread contamination of mineral water with xenoestrogens that partly originates from compounds leaching from the plastic packaging material. These substances possess potent estrogenic activity in vivo in a molluskan sentinel. Overall, the results indicate that a broader range of foodstuff may be contaminated with endocrine disruptors when packed in plastics.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evidence suggests that contaminants of emerging concern are potentially harmful, with possible carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic effects and reproductive developmental toxicity; they may also disrupt gut microbiota and the endocrine system.
“While the impact of most of these substances on human health is not entirely clear at this point, evidence suggests that they are potentially harmful, with possible carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic effects and reproductive developmental toxicity [66]; in addition, they may disrupt the normal functioning of gut microbiota [67] and the endocrine system [68].”
From Bottled Water: An Evidence-Based Overview of Economic Viability, Environmental Impact, and Social Equity (2023) · cites this paper as [68]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 343
- Authors
- Wagner, M., & Oehlmann, J.
- Affiliations
- Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Wagner, Martin
- Venue
- Environmental Science and Pollution Research
- Published
- 2009-03-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 278-286
- ISSN
- 0944-1344 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-7499
- OpenAlex
- W2166856567
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 16.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Science and Pollution Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Umweltbundesamt
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
- Keywords
- endocrine disruptors, bottled mineral water, xenoestrogens, estrogenic activity, plastic leaching, polyethylene terephthalate, food packaging, Potamopyrgus antipodarum, molluscan reproduction, human estrogen receptor alpha, food contamination
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Beverages, Glass, Humans, Plastics, Polyethylene Terephthalates, Reproduction, Snails, Water, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Yeasts, Endocrine Disruptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review