Spatio-temporal dynamics of per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and transfer to periphytic biofilm in an urban river: case-study on the River Seine
Abstract
This study addresses the spatio-temporal dynamics of per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in a highly urbanized freshwater hydrosystem, the Seine River (NW France). The distribution of PFASs between water, sediment, and periphytic biofilm was investigated at three sampling sites along a longitudinal gradient upstream and downstream from the Paris urban area. Seasonal variability was assessed through four sampling campaigns performed under contrasting hydrological conditions. In the dissolved phase, ∑PFASs fluctuated between 2 and 9 ng L-1 upstream and 6-105 ng L-1 downstream from Paris. Negative correlations between dissolved PFAS levels and river flow rate were generally observed, corroborating the predominance of point-source PFAS inputs at these sites. 18/19 target PFASs were detected, with a predominance of PFHxS and PFOS (20% of ∑PFASs each), except for the farthest downstream site where 6:2 FTSA was prevalent (35 ± 8% of ∑PFASs), likely reflecting industrial and urban inputs. In biofilms, ∑PFASs fell in the 4-32 ng g-1 dw range, and substantial bioconcentration factors (BCFs) were reported for PFNA, PFDA, and PFOS (log BCF 2.1-4.3), higher than those of PFHxS or PFOA. BCFs varied inversely with dissolved PFAS levels, potentially pointing to concentration-dependent bioaccumulation. Biofilm community characteristics (C/N ratio) may also be an influential determinant of PFAS bioaccumulation. Graphical abstract ᅟ.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Long-chain PFASs, particularly PFOS, are frequently detected in biofilms.
“Long-chain PFASs, particularly PFOS, are frequently detected in biofilms [186].”
From Industrial Applications, Environmental Fate, Human Exposure, and Health Effects of PFAS (2025) · cites this paper as [186]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 64
- Authors
- Munoz, G., Fechner, L. C., Geneste, E., Pardon, P., Budzinski, H., & Labadie, P.
- Affiliations
- Université de Bordeaux (FR)
- AgroParisTech (FR)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Labadie, Pierre
- Venue
- Environmental Science and Pollution Research
- Published
- 2016-11-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 23574-23582
- ISSN
- 0944-1344 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-7499
- OpenAlex
- W2551035242
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Science and Pollution Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- HAL Portal Artxiker (Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (India)) (submittedVersion)
- Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- Conseil Régional Aquitaine
- European Regional Development Fund
- Interreg
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Keywords
- per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS, periphytic biofilms, urban rivers, spatiotemporal dynamics, seasonal variation, bioconcentration factor, PFOS, PFHxS, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFNA, perfluorodecanoic acid, sediment contamination, point source pollution, bioaccumulation, C/N ratio, urbanization
- MeSH terms
- Periphyton, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, France, Paris, Seasons, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Biofilms, Geologic Sediments, Rivers, Spatio-Temporal Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review