Wood-derived-biochar combined with compost or iron grit for in situ stabilization of Cd, Pb, and Zn in a contaminated soil
Abstract
In situ stabilization of Cd, Pb, and Zn in an Austrian agricultural soil contaminated by atmospheric depositions from a smelter plant was assessed with a pine bark chip-derived biochar, alone and in combination with either compost or iron grit. Biochar amendment was also trialed in an uncontaminated soil to detect any detrimental effect. The pot experiment consisted in ten soil treatments (% w/w): untreated contaminated soil (Unt); Unt soil amended with biochar alone (1%: B1; 2.5%: B2.5) and in combination: B1 and B2.5 + 5% compost (B1C and B2.5C), B1 and B2.5 + 1% iron grit (B1Z and B2.5Z); uncontaminated soil (Ctrl); Ctrl soil amended with 1 or 2.5% biochar (CtrlB1, CtrlB2.5). After a 3-month reaction period, the soil pore water (SPW) was sampled in potted soils and dwarf beans were grown for a 2-week period. The SPW Cd, Pb, and Zn concentrations decreased in all amended-contaminated soils. The biochar effects increased with its addition rate and its combination with either compost or iron grit. Shoot Cd and Zn removals by beans were reduced and shoot Cd, Pb, and Zn concentrations decreased to common values in all amended soils except the B1 soil. Decreases in the SPW Cd/Pb/Zn concentrations did not improve the root and shoot yields of plants as compared to the Ctrl soil.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Applying pine bark chip-derived biochar together with iron grit can effectively immobilize labile soil Cd, Zn, and Pb through increased pH, precipitation-co-precipitation, and various sorption mechanisms.
“Oustriere et al. (2017) reported that applying pine bark chip-derived biochar together with iron grit can effectively immobilize labile soil Cd, Zn, and Pb through increased pH, precipitation-co-precipitation, and various sorption mechanisms.”
From Soil amendments for immobilization of potentially toxic elements in contaminated soils: A critical review (2020) · cites this paper as Oustriere et al., 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 51
- Authors
- Oustriere, N., Marchand, L., Rosette, G., Friesl-Hanl, W., & Mench, M.
- Affiliations
- Université de Bordeaux (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Oustriere, Nadège
- Venue
- Environmental Science and Pollution Research
- Published
- 2017-01-22
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 7468-7481
- ISSN
- 0944-1344 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-7499
- OpenAlex
- W2581809203
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Science and Pollution Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- ADEME
- ANR (program PHYTOCHEM)
- ERA-Net FACCE SURPLUS
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
- Keywords
- biochar, in situ soil stabilization, heavy metal contamination, cadmium, lead, zinc, compost, agricultural soils, soil pore water, bush bean, plant metal uptake, soil amendment
- MeSH terms
- Charcoal, Iron, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Wood, Metals, Heavy, Environmental Restoration and Remediation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review