Cited by 42Carbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal

Application of biochar for acid gas removal: experimental and statistical analysis using CO2

Bamdad, Hanieh, Hawboldt, Kelly, MacQuarrie, Stephanie, Papari, Sadegh·2019·Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract

Acid gases such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide are common contaminants in oil and gas operations, landfill gases, and exhaust stacks from power plants. While there are processes currently used to treat these effluents (e.g., amine absorption and adsorption using zeolite), many of these processes require high energy, space, and hazardous chemicals. Removal using biochar derived from the fast pyrolysis of forestry residues represents a more sustainable option. In this study, adsorption using CO 2 as a surrogate for acid gases was investigated using various biochars produced from fast pyrolysis of sawmill residues. Response surface methodology was used to determine operating conditions for maximum adsorption and assess interaction of the adsorption parameters, i.e., temperature, inlet feed flow rate, and CO 2 concentration, on biochar adsorption capacity. The Freundlich isotherm best represented the equilibrium adsorption, and the kinetic model was pseudo first-order. Thermodynamic analysis indicated the adsorption process was spontaneous and exothermic. The biochar had better adsorption capacity relative to commercial zeolite. Our results suggested that biochar could be used as a sustainable and cost-effective option for contaminant removal from acid gases produced in landfill gas treatment, fossil fuel extraction, and/or combustion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11356-019-04509-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pseudo-first-order model is suitable for physical adsorption between sorbents and gases.

    “which prove that the pseudo-first-order model is suitable for physical adsorption between sorbents and gases.”

    From Direct air capture of CO2 by KOH-activated bamboo biochar (2022) · cites this paper as [47]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 42

Authors
Bamdad, H., Hawboldt, K., MacQuarrie, S., & Papari, S.
Affiliations
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
  • Cape Breton University (CA)
Corresponding author
Bamdad, Hanieh
Venue
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Published
2019-02-19
Volume
26
Issue
11
Pages
10902-10915
ISSN
  • 0944-1344 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7499
OpenAlex
W2915579784
Cited by
42
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cape Breton University
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Keywords
biochar, acid gas removal, CO2 adsorption, sawmill waste, fast pyrolysis, forest residues, Freundlich isotherm, pseudo-first-order kinetics, adsorption thermodynamics, landfill gas treatment, hydrogen sulfide, zeolite comparison, response surface methodology
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Air Pollutants, Carbon Dioxide, Charcoal, Hydrogen Sulfide, Kinetics, Models, Theoretical, Surface Properties, Thermodynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review