Cited by 69Arsenic contamination and mitigationAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

Fe–Mn–Ce oxide-modified biochar composites as efficient adsorbents for removing As(III) from water: adsorption performance and mechanisms

Liu, Xuewei, Gao, Minling, Qiu, Weiwen, Khan, Zulqarnain Haider, Liu, Nengbin, Lin, Lina, Song, Zhengguo·2019·Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract

In this study, a novel Fe-Mn-Ce oxide-modified biochar composite (FMCBC) was synthesized via pyrolysis to enhance the adsorption capacity of biochar (BC). Scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirmed that Fe, Mn, and Ce were successfully loaded onto the surface of the BC. A series of adsorption experiments showed that the FMCBC exhibited improved adsorption of As(III) in an aqueous environment. The adsorption process was well expressed by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The adsorption capacity of FMCBC reached 8.74 mg L -1 , which was 3.27 times greater than that of BC. The pH of the solution significantly influenced the adsorption of As(III), where the amount of As(III) adsorbed by FMCBC was maximized at pH 3. A high phosphate concentration inhibited adsorption, whereas nitrate and sulfate ions promoted As(III) adsorption and increased the FMCBC adsorption capacity. Similarly, with increasing humic acid concentration, the adsorption capacity of FMCBC for As(III) decreased; however, a low concentration of humic acid promoted adsorption. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis revealed that the adsorption of As(III) by FMCBC occurred through redox and surface complexation reactions. Therefore, FMCBC has excellent potential for purifying arsenic-contaminated water.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11356-019-04914-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 50 · Cited by 69

Authors
Liu, X., Gao, M., Qiu, W., Khan, Z. H., Liu, N., Lin, L., & Song, Z.
Affiliations
  • Agro-Environmental Protection Institute (CN)
  • Tiangong University (CN)
  • Plant & Food Research (NZ)
Corresponding author
Song, Zhengguo
Venue
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Published
2019-04-24
Volume
26
Issue
17
Pages
17373-17382
ISSN
  • 0944-1344 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7499
OpenAlex
W2941973343
Cited by
69
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (41771525)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
arsenic(III) removal, biochar composites, adsorption, redox reactions, surface complexation, humic acid interference, phosphate inhibition, adsorption kinetics, pH effect
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Arsenic, Charcoal, Humic Substances, Iron, Kinetics, Nitrates, Nitrogen Oxides, Organic Chemicals, Oxidation-Reduction, Oxides, Water, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Purification, Photoelectron Spectroscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review