Cited by 38Enzyme-mediated dye degradationAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

A review on application of phytoremediation technique for eradication of synthetic dyes by using ornamental plants

Kaushal, Jyotsna, Mahajan, Pooja, Kaur, Navjeet·2021·Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract

Phytoremediation emerges as an innovative and eco-friendly technique to remediate textile dyes with the use of various categories of plants. In recent years, ornamental plants emerge as more attractive and effective substitute in comparison to edible plants for phytoremediation. Regardless of aesthetic value, some ornamental plants can be grown to remediate the sites contaminated with dyes, heavy metals, pesticides, or other organic compounds. In this review, we focus on pioneer research on synthetic dye removal using ornamental plants and evaluate the phytoremediation capability of ornamental plants for treatment of textile effluent. This paper also emphasized specific ornamental plants having high accumulation and tolerance ability for removal of dyes. The mechanisms explored for the phytoremediation of dyes by ornamental plants have also been explained. This review will also be helpful for researchers for exploring more new ornamental plants in phytoremediation technique.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11356-021-16672-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several plants such as Brassicaceae, Noccaea caerulescens, Arabidopsis thaliana, Chicorium spinosum, Sedum alfredii, and Silene vulgaris O. muralis are studied in detail to understand the mechanism of hyperaccumulation.

    “In addition, several plants, such as Brassicaceae, Noccaea caerulescens, Arabidopsis thaliana, Chicorium spinosum, and Sedum alfredii. Hance, and Silene vulgaris O. muralis, are studied in detail to have deep insights into understanding the mechanism of hyperaccumulation (Kaushal et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 184 · Cited by 38

Authors
Kaushal, J., Mahajan, P., & Kaur, N.
Affiliations
Chitkara University (IN)
Corresponding author
Mahajan, Pooja
Venue
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Published
2021-10-12
Volume
28
Issue
48
Pages
67970-67989
ISSN
  • 0944-1344 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7499
OpenAlex
W3207781692
Cited by
38
References
184
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Enzyme-mediated dye degradation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
phytoremediation, synthetic dyes, textile wastewater, ornamental plants, dye removal, heavy metal accumulation, plant tolerance
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Coloring Agents, Plants, Soil Pollutants, Textiles, Metals, Heavy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review