Cited by 8Arsenic contamination and mitigationChromium effects and bioremediationHeavy Metal Pollution Remediation

Bioremediation of heavy metals by an unexplored bacterium, Pseudoxanthomonas mexicana strain GTZY isolated from aerobic-biofilm wastewater system

Open access
Abdul Raheem, Nelofer, Selvaraj, Ganesh-Kumar, Karuppanan, Kalimuthu, Ganesan, Govindarajan, Soorangkattan, Saravanan, Subramanian, Balachandran, Ramamurthy Baluraj, Shivani, Rajaiah, Dhilip Kumar +1 more·2024·Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract We prompted first to characterize a wastewater bacterium, Pseudoxanthomonas mexicana GTZY, that efficiently transforms toxic mercury and arsenic and to explore its bioremediation capability and to reveal their relevant gene resistance operons. The Isolated strain was characterized for its phylogenetic, biochemical and phenotypic properties. The strain GTZY potentially removed 84.3% of mercury and their mercury volatilization (Hg(II) to Hg(0)) was confirmed using X-ray film method, and its respective merA gene was PCR amplified. In addition, strain GTZY was efficiently removed arsenate (68.5%) and arsenite (63.2%), and showed resistance up to >175 and >55 mM, respectively. Their genomic annotations were disclosed the linkage of Tn2-transposon and int1 in both ends of meroperon (merAPTR). The co-existence of arsP and arsH proteins in its intrinsic ars operon (arsCPRH) was extremely diverse from its ancestral species. We believe that mercury resistance-conferring meroperon of P. mexicana GTZY presumably derived horizontally from other species in the reactor, while arsenic resistance-conferring intrinsic ars operon was highly diversified and evolved from its ancestral species. By considering the potential of the strain GTZY to transform heavy metals, this can be used to recover contaminated sites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11356-024-34602-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Eckley CS, Gilmour CC, Janssen S, et al (2020) The assessment and remediation of mercury contaminated sites: A review of current approaches. Sci Total Environ 707:136031
  2. Jobby R, Jha P, Yadav AK, Desai N (2018) Biosorption and biotransformation of hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)]: A comprehensive review. Chemosphere 207:255-266
  3. Raj D, Maiti SK (2019) Sources, toxicity, and remediation of mercury: an essence review. Environ Monit Assess 191:566
  4. Wang L, Hou D, Cao Y, et al (2020) Remediation of mercury contaminated soil, water, and air: A review of emerging materials and innovative technologies. Environ Int 134:105281
  5. Wuana RA, Okieimen FE (2011) Heavy metals in contaminated soils: A review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation. ISRN Ecol 2011:1-20

Authors
Abdul Raheem, N., Selvaraj, G.-K., Karuppanan, K., Ganesan, G., Soorangkattan, S., Subramanian, B., Ramamurthy Baluraj, S., Rajaiah, D. K., & Hasan, I.
Affiliations
  • St. Peter's Institute of Higher Education and Research (IN)
  • SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN)
  • The Madura College (IN)
  • University of Ulsan (KR)
  • King Saud University (SA)
Corresponding author
Selvaraj, Ganesh-Kumar
Venue
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Published
2024-08-08
Volume
32
Issue
37
Pages
22036-22050
ISSN
  • 0944-1344 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7499
OpenAlex
W4401430998
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • King Saud University (RSPD2024R670)
  • State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs
  • Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chromium effects and bioremediation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
Keywords
Pseudoxanthomonas mexicana, mercury bioremediation, arsenic bioremediation, heavy metal resistance, mer operon, ars operon, mercury volatilization, merA gene, transposon insertion, horizontal gene transfer, bacterial strain characterization, contaminated site remediation
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Mercury, Operon, Phylogeny, Biofilms, Metals, Heavy, Xanthomonadaceae, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review