Cited by 0Environmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyCollembola Taxonomy and Ecology StudiesPesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies

Toxicity of pyroligneous extract to Folsomia candida Willem, 1902 (Collembola: Isotomidae) in Tropical Artificial Soil

Open access
Rebolho, Ariane Sommer, Rosa, Vanessa Mignon Dalla, Kessler, Nathalie Caroline Hirt, Pereira, Flávia Alves, Tessaro, Dinéia·2026·Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract

The agricultural use of pyroligneous extracts has expanded in recent years; however, information regarding their effects on non-target soil organisms remains limited, particularly under tropical conditions. This study evaluated the acute and chronic toxicity of a commercial pyroligneous extract to the springtail Folsomia candida in Tropical Artificial Soil. Standardized bioassays were conducted using eight concentrations (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 1, 2, 4, and 6%). Survival and reproduction were assessed after 28 days of exposure, and ecotoxicological thresholds were estimated using dose–response analyses. Significant effects on survival were observed at 0.2% and 4.0%; however, mortality did not reach 50% at any tested concentration, preventing the estimation of the LC50. The survival pattern suggested a non-monotonic response. Reproduction was the most sensitive endpoint, showing significant reductions from the lowest tested concentration (0.1%), with an EC50 of 3.39% estimated using a nonlinear logistic model. pyroligneous extract may cause relevant sublethal effects on soil fauna and highlight the importance of reproductive endpoints for environmental risk assessment and the establishment of environmentally safe application thresholds in tropical soils.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11356-026-37996-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40

Authors
Rebolho, A. S., Rosa, V. M. D., Kessler, N. C. H., Pereira, F. A., & Tessaro, D.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (BR)
  • Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR)
Corresponding author
Tessaro, Dinéia
Venue
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Published
2026-07-08
Volume
33
Issue
23
Pages
11566-11574
ISSN
  • 0944-1344 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7499
OpenAlex
W7167662342
Cited by
0
References
40
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Universidade Tecnológica Federal Do Paraná
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Keywords
Folsomia candida, Collembola, soil toxicity, acute toxicity, chronic toxicity, sublethal effects, reproduction, survival, non-monotonic response, dose-response relationship, soil fauna, agrochemicals
MeSH terms
Animals, Arthropods, Reproduction, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Tropical Climate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review