Toxicity of pyroligneous extract to Folsomia candida Willem, 1902 (Collembola: Isotomidae) in Tropical Artificial Soil
Open accessAbstract
The agricultural use of pyroligneous extracts has expanded in recent years; however, information regarding their effects on non-target soil organisms remains limited, particularly under tropical conditions. This study evaluated the acute and chronic toxicity of a commercial pyroligneous extract to the springtail Folsomia candida in Tropical Artificial Soil. Standardized bioassays were conducted using eight concentrations (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 1, 2, 4, and 6%). Survival and reproduction were assessed after 28 days of exposure, and ecotoxicological thresholds were estimated using dose–response analyses. Significant effects on survival were observed at 0.2% and 4.0%; however, mortality did not reach 50% at any tested concentration, preventing the estimation of the LC50. The survival pattern suggested a non-monotonic response. Reproduction was the most sensitive endpoint, showing significant reductions from the lowest tested concentration (0.1%), with an EC50 of 3.39% estimated using a nonlinear logistic model. pyroligneous extract may cause relevant sublethal effects on soil fauna and highlight the importance of reproductive endpoints for environmental risk assessment and the establishment of environmentally safe application thresholds in tropical soils.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40
- Authors
- Rebolho, A. S., Rosa, V. M. D., Kessler, N. C. H., Pereira, F. A., & Tessaro, D.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (BR)
- Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (BR)
- Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Tessaro, Dinéia
- ORCID
- Venue
- Environmental Science and Pollution Research
- Published
- 2026-07-08
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 11566-11574
- ISSN
- 0944-1344 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-7499
- PMC
- PMC13423904
- OpenAlex
- W7167662342
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Environmental Science and Pollution Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Universidade Tecnológica Federal Do Paraná
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
- Keywords
- Folsomia candida, Collembola, soil toxicity, acute toxicity, chronic toxicity, sublethal effects, reproduction, survival, non-monotonic response, dose-response relationship, soil fauna, agrochemicals
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Arthropods, Reproduction, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Tropical Climate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review