Environmental benefits from reusing clothes
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For reuse, a 1:1 replacement rate presumes that the new owner of the reused item uses the item as many times as the owner would have used a brand new item, which has been shown to be unrealistic.
“For reuse, a 1:1 replacement rate presumes that the new owner of the reused item uses the item as many times as the owner would have used a brand new item, which has been shown to be unrealistic”
From Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review (2018) · cites this paper as Farrant et al., 2010
Based on the number of citations from other environmental assessments of reuse/recycling, Woolridge et al. (2006) appears to be considered the seminal piece of work among the reviewed studies, with 15 citations, followed by Allwood et al. (2006) with 10 citations and Farrant et al. (2010) with 9 citations.
“Based on the number of citations from other environmental assessments of reuse/recycling, Woolridge et al. (2006) appears to be considered the seminal piece of work among the reviewed studies, with 15 citations, followed by Allwood et al. (2006) with 10 citations and Farrant et al. (2010) with 9 citations.”
From Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review (2018) · cites this paper as Farrant et al., 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review
Sandin, G., & Peters, G. M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266 · Cited by 1,087 · see citing works
“Six publications include some kind of weighting, either endpoint indicators complementing midpoint indicators (Dahlbo et al., 2017; Beton et al., 2014; Palm et al., 2013; Farrant et al., 2010), or end-point indicators without showing results for the contributing midpoint indicators (Muthu et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Environmental Impacts of Reuse: A Review
Cooper, D. R., & Gutowski, T. G. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12388 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
- Authors
- Farrant, L., Olsen, S. I., & Wangel, A.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Denmark (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Olsen, Stig Irving
- Venue
- The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
- Published
- 2010-05-27
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 726-736
- ISSN
- 0948-3349 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-7502
- OpenAlex
- W1998231048
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (publishedVersion)
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- second-hand clothing, second-hand shops, environmental impact, global warming, human toxicity, cotton t-shirts, customer survey, Sweden, Estonia, Africa, developing countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
