Cited by 68Environmental Impact and SustainabilityEnergy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

Consumption-as-usual instead of ceteris paribus assumption for demand: Integration of potential rebound effects into LCA

Open access
Girod, Bastien, de Haan, Peter, Scholz, Roland W.·2011·The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11367-010-0240-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • E-commerce's changes to physical space have impacts on supply chain dynamics, redistributing the environmental footprint of operations, logistics and transportation.

    “This, in turn, has impacts on supply chain dynamics, redistributing the environmental footprint of operations (e.g. heating and cooling), logistics and transportation [41].”

    From From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debate (2025) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Abstract says product changes can lead households to reallocate consumption, changing environmental impact. But the paper does not link e-commerce or changes in physical space to supply-chain operations, heating and cooling, logistics, or transportation footprints; its mention of online shopping in §4.2 concerns consumer preferences. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 68

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Banks J, Blundell R, Lewbel A (1997) Quadratic engel curves and consumer demand. Rev Econ Stat 79(4):527-539
  2. Becker GS (1976) The economic approach to human behavior. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  3. Brannlund R, Ghalwash T, Nordstrom J (2007) Increased energy efficiency and the rebound effect: effects on consumption and emissions. Energ Econ 29(1):1-17
  4. Brookes L (2000) Energy efficiency fallacies revisited. Energ Policy 28(6-7):355-366
  5. Cordella M, Tugnoli A, Spadoni G, Santarelli F, Zangrando T (2008) LCA of an Italian lager beer. Int J Life Cycle Ass 13(2):133-139
  6. de Haan P, Mueller MG, Peters A (2006) Does the hybrid toyota prius lead to rebound effects? Analysis of size and number of cars previously owned by Swiss Prius buyers. Ecol Econ 58(3):592-605
  7. de Haan P, Peters A, Scholz RW (2007) Reducing energy consump- tion in road transport through hybrid vehicles: investigation of rebound effects, and possible effects of tax rebates. J Clean Prod 15(11-12):1076-1084. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.025 · DOI
  8. Duan H, Eugster M, Hischier R, Streicher-Porte M, Li J (2009) Life cycle assessment study of a chinese desktop personal computer. Sci Total Environ 407(5):1755-1764
  9. Faist Emmenegger M, Frischknecht R, Stutz M, Guggisberg M, Witschi R, Otto T (2006) Life cycle assessment of the mobile communication system UMTS: towards eco-efficient systems (12 pp). Int J Life Cycle Ass 11(4):265-276
  10. Girod B, de Haan P (2009) GHG reduction potential of changes in consumption patterns and higher quality levels: evidence from Swiss household consumption survey. Energ Policy 37 (12):5650-5661
  11. Girod B, de Haan P (2010) More or better? A model for changes in household greenhouse gas emissions due to higher income. J Ind Ecol 14(1):31-49
  12. Girod B, Wiek A, Mieg H, Hulme M (2009) The evolution of the IPCC_s emissions scenarios. Environ Sci Policy 12(2):103-118
  13. Hertwich EG (2005) Consumption and the rebound effect-an industrial ecology perspective. J Ind Ecol 9(1-2):85-98
  14. Jalas M (2005) The everyday life context of increasing energy demands-time use survey data in a decomposition analysis. J Ind Ecol 9(1-2):129-145
  15. Jungbluth N, Tietje O, Scholz RW (2000) Food purchases: impacts from the consumers' point of view investigated with a modular LCA. Int J Life Cycle Ass 5(3):134-142
  16. Maeder P, Fliessbach A, Dubois D, Gunst L, Fried P, Niggli U (2002) Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296 (5573):1694-1697. doi:10.1126/science.1071148 · DOI
  17. Spielmann M, Scholz RW (2005) Life cycle inventories of transport services. Int J Life Cycle Ass 10(1):85-94. doi:10.1065/ lca.10.181. · DOI
  18. Spielmann M, Scholz RW, Tietje O, de Haan P (2005) Scenario modelling in prospective LCA of transport systems-application of formative scenario analysis. Int J Life Cycle Ass 10(5):325- 335. doi:10.1065/lca2004.10.188 · DOI
  19. Spielmann M, de Haan P, Scholz RW (2008) Environmental rebound effects of high-speed transport technologies: a case study of climate change rebound effects of a future underground maglev train system. J Clean Prod 16(13):1388-1398. doi:10.1016/j. jclepro.2007.08.001 · DOI
  20. Stock JH (1988) A reexamination of Friedman consumption puzzle. J Bus Econ Stat 6(4):401-407
  21. Thaler RH (1999) Mental accounting matters. J Behav Decis Making 12(3):183-206
  22. Thiesen J, Christensen T, Kristensen T, Andersen R, Brunoe B, Gregersen T, Thrane M, Weidema B (2008) Rebound effects of price differences. Int J Life Cycle Ass 13(2):104-114

Authors
Girod, B., de Haan, P., & Scholz, R. W.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Girod, Bastien
Venue
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Published
2010-11-03
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
3-11
ISSN
  • 0948-3349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7502
OpenAlex
W1522205808
Cited by
68
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (112475, 105212)
  • Universiteit Leiden
  • Paul Scherrer Institut
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Keywords
rebound effect, ceteris paribus assumption, household consumption, household demand, household resources, mobility, transport modes, sustainable consumption, ISO 14040, environmental impact assessment, product modification, household preferences, purchasing power, living space, time use, sustainable transport policy, sustainable consumption policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review