Environmental trade-offs across cascading lithium-ion battery life cycles
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
End-of-life EV batteries may experience a second-use for less demanding applications, such as stationary energy storage, as they often have remaining capacities of around 70-80% of their original capacity.
“EoL EV batteries may experience a second-use for less demanding applications (non-automotive), such as stationary energy storage, as they often have remaining capacities of around 70-80% of their original capacity 70,71 .”
From Future material demand for automotive lithium-based batteries (2020) · cites this paper as [70]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 186
- Authors
- Richa, K., Babbitt, C. W., Nenadic, N. G., & Gaustad, G.
- Affiliations
- Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Babbitt, Callie W.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
- Published
- 2015-08-11
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 66-81
- ISSN
- 0948-3349 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-7502
- OpenAlex
- W1199122973
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 7.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Keywords
- lithium-ion batteries, electric vehicle batteries, battery reuse, second-life batteries, stationary energy storage, battery life cycle, environmental trade-offs, lead-acid battery comparison, battery recycling, global warming potential, cumulative energy demand, environmental impact allocation, battery reliability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
