Cited by 91Environmental Impact and SustainabilitySustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisSustainable Design and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Current trends and limitations of life cycle assessment applied to the urban scale: critical analysis and review of selected literature

Mirabella, Nadia, Allacker, Karen, Sala, Serenella·2019·The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11367-018-1467-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 91

  1. Aguilar AG, Ward PM, Smith CB (2003) Globalization, regional development, and mega-city expansion in Latin America: analyzing Mexico City’s periurban hinterland. Cities 20:3–21 · DOI
  2. Albertí J, Balaguera A, Brodhag C, Fullana-i-palmer P (2017) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment of cities. A review of background knowledge. Sci Total Environ 609:1049–1063 · DOI
  3. Atilgan B, Azapagic A (2015) Life cycle environmental impacts of electricity from fossil fuels in Turkey. J Clean Prod 106:555–564 · DOI
  4. Barjoveanu G, Comandaru IM, Rodriguez-Garcia G, Hospido A, Teodosiu C (2014) Evaluation of water services system through LCA. A case study for Iasi City, Romania. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:449–462 · DOI
  5. Beloin-Saint-Pierre D, Rugani B, Lasvaux S, Mailhac A, Popovici E, Sibiude G, Benetto E, Schiopu N (2017) A review of urban metabolism studies to identify key methodological choices for future harmonization and implementation. J Clean Prod 163(Suppl 1):S223–S240 · DOI
  6. Benediktsson JA, Pesaresi M, Amason K (2003) Classification and feature extraction for remote sensing images from urban areas based on morphological transformations. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 41:1940–1949 · DOI
  7. Bezama A, Douglas C, Méndez J, Szarka N, Muñoz E, Navia R, Schock S, Konrad O, Ulloa C (2013) Life cycle comparison of waste-to-energy alternatives for municipal waste treatment in Chilean Patagonia. Waste Manag Res 31:67–74 · DOI
  8. Bonamente E, Pelliccia L, Merico MC, Rinaldi S, Petrozzi A (2015) The multifunctional environmental energy tower: carbon footprint and land use analysis of an integrated renewable energy plant. Sustain 7:13564–13584 · DOI
  9. Brown LA, Holmes J (1971) The delimitation of functional regions, nodal regions, and hierarchies by functional distance approaches. J Region Science 11:57–72 · DOI
  10. Cabeza LF, Rincón L, Vilariño V, Pérez G, Castell A (2014) Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 29:394–416 · DOI
  11. Cai Y, Yue W, Xu L, Yang Z, Rong Q (2016) Sustainable urban water resources management considering life-cycle environmental impacts of water utilization under uncertainty. Resour Conserv Recycl 108:21–40 · DOI
  12. Chen C, Su M, Yang Z, Liu G (2014) Evaluation of the environmental impact of the urban energy lifecycle based on lifecycle assessment. Front Earth Sci 8(1):123–130 · DOI
  13. Chester M, Pincetl S, Allenby B (2012) Avoiding unintended tradeoffs by integrating life-cycle impact assessment with urban metabolism. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4:451–457 · DOI
  14. Clark SS, Chester MV (2017) A hybrid approach for assessing the multi-scale impacts of urban resource use: transportation in Phoenix, Arizona. J Ind Ecol 21:136–150 · DOI
  15. Cleary J (2013) Life cycle assessments of wine and spirit packaging at the product and the municipal scale: a Toronto, Canada case study. J Clean Prod 44:143–151 · DOI
  16. Cousins JJ, Newell JP (2015) A political–industrial ecology of water supply infrastructure for Los Angeles. Geoforum 58:38–50 · DOI
  17. Coventry ZA, Tize R, Karunanithi AT (2016) Comparative life cycle assessment of solid waste management strategies. Clean Techn Environ Policy 18:1515–1524 · DOI
  18. Chi Y, Dong J, Tang Y, Huang Q, Ni M (2015) Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste source-separated collection and integrated waste management systems in Hangzhou, China. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 17:695–706 · DOI
  19. Douglass M (2000) Mega-urban regions and world city formation: globalisation, the economic crisis and urban policy issues in Pacific Asia. Urban Stud 37:2315–2335 · DOI
  20. Elmqvist T, Fragkias M, Goodness J, Güneralp B, Marcotullio PJ, McDonald RI, Parnell S, Schewenius M, Sendstad M, Seto KC, Wilkinson C (eds) (2013) Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities: a global assessment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_33 · DOI
  21. Erses Yay AS (2015) Application of life cycle assessment (LCA) for municipal solid waste management: a case study of Sakarya. J Clean Prod 94:284–293 · DOI
  22. Ferrão P, Fernandez J (2013) Sustainable urban metabolism. MIT Press, ISBN9780262019361 · DOI
  23. François C, Gondran N, Nicolas J-P, Parsons D (2017) Environmental assessment of urban mobility: combining life cycle assessment with land-use and transport interaction modelling—application to Lyon (France). Ecol Indic 72:597–604 · DOI
  24. Fraser A, Chester MV (2016) Environmental and economic consequences of permanent roadway infrastructure commitment: city road network lifecycle assessment and Los Angeles County. J Infrastruct Syst 22:4015018 · DOI
  25. Gerber L, Fazlollahi S, Maréchal F (2013) A systematic methodology for the environomic design and synthesis of energy systems combining process integration, Life Cycle Assessment and industrial ecology. Comput Chem Eng 59:2–16 · DOI
  26. Ghinea C, Petraru M, Bressers HT, Gavrilescu M (2012) Environmental evaluation of waste management scenarios—significance of the boundaries. J Environ Eng Landsc Manag 20:76–85 · DOI
  27. Goldstein B, Birkved M, Quitzau MB, Hauschild M (2013) Quantification of urban metabolism through coupling with the life cycle assessment framework: concept and development and case study. Environ Res Lett 8(3):035024 · DOI
  28. Grosso M, Nava C, Testori R, Rigamonti L, Vigano’ L (2012) The implementation of anaerobic digestion of food waste in a highly populated urban area: an LCA evaluation. Waste Manage Res 30(9 Supplement):78–87 · DOI
  29. Gunamantha M, Sarto (2012) Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste treatment to energy options: case study of KARTAMANTUL region, Yogyakarta. Renew Energy 41:277–284 · DOI
  30. Hartshorne R (1933) Geographic and political boundaries in Upper Silesia. Annals Ass Am Geol 23:195–228 · DOI
  31. Hauschild MZ, Huijbregts MAJ (2015) Life cycle impact assessment. LCA Compendium – The Complete World of Life Cycle Assessment book series (LCAC). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9744-3 · DOI
  32. Heinonen J, Jalas M, Juntunen JK, Ala-Mantila S, Junnila S (2013a) Situated lifestyles: II. The impacts of urban density, housing type and motorization on the greenhouse gas emissions of the middle-income consumers in Finland. Environ Res Lett 8:35050 · DOI
  33. Heinonen J, Jalas M, Juntunen JK, Ala-Mantila S, Junnila S (2013b) Situated lifestyles: I. How lifestyles change along with the level of urbanization and what the greenhouse gas implications are—a study of Finland. Environ Res Lett 8:25003 · DOI
  34. Hellweg S, MilàiCanals L (2014) Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science 344:1109–1113 · DOI
  35. Hidle K, Farsund AA, Lysgård HK (2009) Urban–rural flows and the meaning of borders functional and symbolic integration in Norwegian City-regions. Eur Urban Reg Stud 16:409–421 · DOI
  36. Ivanova D, Stadler D, Steen-Olsen K, Wood K, Vita R, Tukker G, Hertwich A (2016) Environmental impact assessment of household consumption. J Ind Ecol 20:526–536 · DOI
  37. Jeong H, Minne E, Crittenden JC (2015) Life cycle assessment of the City of Atlanta, Georgia’s centralized water system. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:880–891 · DOI
  38. Kalbar PP, Birkved M, Kabins S, Nygaard SE (2016) Personal metabolism (PM) coupled with life cycle assessment (LCA) model: Danish case study. Environ Int 91:168–179 · DOI
  39. Kennedy CA, Ramaswami A, Carney S, Dhakal S (2011) Greenhouse gas emission baselines for global cities and metropolitan regions. Cities and climate change: responding to an urgent agenda. Pages 15–54. https://doi.org/10.1596/9780821384930_CH02 · DOI
  40. Kennedy CA, Stewart I, Facchini A, Cersosimo I, Mele R, Chen B, Uda M, Kansal A, Chiu A, Kim KG, Dubeux C, Lebre la Rovere E, Cunha B, Pincetl S, Keirstead J, Barles S, Pusaka S, Gunawan J, Adegbile M, Nazariha M, Hoque S, Marcotullio PJ, González Otharán F, Genena T, Ibrahim N, Farooqui R, Cervantes G, Sahin AD (2015) Energy and material flows of megacities. PNAS 112:5985–5990 · DOI
  41. Kissinger M, Sussman C, Moore J, Rees WE (2013) Accounting for the ecological footprint of materials in consumer goods at the urban scale. Sustainability 5:1960–1973 · DOI
  42. Koroneos CJ, Nanaki EA (2012) Integrated solid waste management and energy production—a life cycle assessment approach: the case study of the city of Thessaloniki. J Clean Prod 27:141–150 · DOI
  43. Lam C-M, Lee P-H, Hsu S-C (2016) Eco-efficiency analysis of sludge treatment scenarios in urban cities: the case of Hong Kong. J Clean Prod 112:3028–3039 · DOI
  44. Lane JL, de Haas DW, Lant PA (2015) The diverse environmental burden of city-scale urban water systems. Water Res 81:398–415 · DOI
  45. Lenzen M, Peters GM (2009) How city dwellers affect their resource hinterland. J Ind Ecol 14:73–90 · DOI
  46. Li Y, Xiong W, Zhang W, Wang C, Wang P (2016) Life cycle assessment of water supply alternatives in water-receiving areas of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project in China. Water Res 89:9–19 · DOI
  47. Liu KF, Hung M, Yeh P, Kuo J (2014) GIS-based regionalization of LCA. J Geosci Environ Prot 2:1–8
  48. Liu H, Xu YA, Stockwell N, Rodgers MO, Guensler R (2016) A comparative life-cycle energy and emissions analysis for intercity passenger transportation in the U.S. by aviation, intercity bus, and automobile. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 48:267–283 · DOI
  49. Loiseau E, Roux P, Junqua G (2013) Adapting the LCA framework to environmental assessment in land planning. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1533–1548 · DOI
  50. Loiseau E, Roux P, Junqua G, Maurel P, Bellon-Maurel V (2014) Implementation of an adapted LCA framework to environmental assessment of a territory: important learning points from a French Mediterranean case study. J Clean Prod 80:17–29 · DOI
  51. Lotteau M, Loubet P, Pousse M, Dufrasnes E, Sonnemann G (2015a) Critical review of life cycle assessment (LCA) for the built environment at the neighborhood scale. Build Environ 93:165–178 · DOI
  52. Lotteau M, Yepez-Salmon G, Salmon N (2015b) Environmental assessment of sustainable neighborhood projects through NEST, a decision support tool for early stage urban planning. Proc Eng 115:69–76 · DOI
  53. Loubet P, Roux P, Guérin-Schneider L, Bellon-Maurel V (2016) Life cycle assessment of forecasting scenarios for urban water management: a first implementation of the WaLA model on Paris suburban area. Water Res 90:128–140 · DOI
  54. Mahgoub MESM, van der Steen NP, Abu-Zeid K, Vairavamoorthy K (2010) Towards sustainability in urban water: a life cycle analysis of the urban water system of Alexandria City, Egypt. J Clean Prod 18:1100–1106 · DOI
  55. Mailhac A, Herfray G, Schiopu N, Kotelnikova-Weiler N, Poulhes A, Mainguy S, Grimaud J, Serre J, Sibiude G, Lebert A, Peuportier B, Valean C (2016) LCA applicability at district scale demonstrated throughout a case study: shortcomings and perspectives for future improvements. Zurich, June 15–17, 2016, Sustainable Built Environment (SBE) Regional Conference
  56. Mastrucci A, Marvuglia A, Popovici E, Leopold U, Benetto E (2017a) Geospatial characterization of building material stocks for the life cycle assessment of end-of-life scenarios at the urban scale. Resour Conserv Recycl 123:54–66 · DOI
  57. Mastrucci A, Marvuglia A, Leopold U, Benetto E (2017b) Life cycle assessment of building stocks from urban to transnational scales: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 74:316–332 · DOI
  58. Moret S, Peduzzi E, Gerber L, Maréchal F (2016) Integration of deep geothermal energy and woody biomass conversion pathways in urban systems. Energy Convers Manag 129:305–318 · DOI
  59. Nichols B, Kockelman K (2015) Urban form and life-cycle energy consumption: case studies at the city scale. J Transport Land Use 8(3):115–129
  60. Opher T, Friedler E (2016) Comparative LCA of decentralized wastewater treatment alternatives for non-potable urban reuse. J Environ Manag 182:464–476 · DOI
  61. Oregi X, Pousse M, Mabe L, Escudero A, Mardaras I (2016) Sustainability assessment of three districts in the city of Donostia through the NEST simulation tool. Nat Resour Forum 40:156–168 · DOI
  62. Othman SN, Noor ZZ, Abba AH, Yusuf R, Hassan M (2013) Review on life cycle assessment of integrated solid waste management in some Asian countries. J Clean Prod 41:251–262 · DOI
  63. Padeyanda Y, Jang Y-C, Ko Y, Yi S (2016) Evaluation of environmental impacts of food waste management by material flow analysis (MFA) and life cycle assessment (LCA). J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18:493–508 · DOI
  64. Padovan D, Martini F, Cerutti AK (2015) Social practices of ordinary consumption: an introduction to household metabolism. J Socialomics 4:119 · DOI
  65. Petit-Boix A, Llorach-Massana P, Sanjuan-Delmas D et al (2017) Application of life cycle thinking towards sustainable cities: a review. J Clean Prod 166:939–951 · DOI
  66. Peuportier B, Roux C (2013) Eco-design of urban sttlements using LCA. LCA [avniR] Conf. 2013, Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. life cycle approaches, pp 1–6
  67. Pincetl S, Bunje P, Holmes T (2012) Landscape and urban planning an expanded urban metabolism method: toward a systems approach for assessing urban energy processes and causes. Landsc Urban Plan 107:193–202 · DOI
  68. Pintilie L, Torres CM, Teodosiu C, Castells F (2016) Urban wastewater reclamation for industrial reuse: an LCA case study. J Clean Prod 139:1–14 · DOI
  69. Rashed T, Weeks JR, Roberts D, Rogan J, Powell R (2003) Measuring the physical composition of urban morphology using multiple endmember spectral mixture models. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69:1011–1020 · DOI
  70. Reichert GA, Mendes CAB (2014) Avaliação do ciclo de vida e apoio à decisão em gerenciamento integrado e sustentável de resíduos sólidos urbanos. Eng Sanit Ambient 19:301–313 · DOI
  71. Ripa M, Fiorentino G, Giani H, Clausen A, Ulgiati S (2017) Refuse recovered biomass fuel from municipal solid waste. A life cycle assessment. Appl Energy 186(part 3):211–225 · DOI
  72. Risch E, Gutierrez O, Roux P, Boutin C, Corominas L (2015) Life cycle assessment of urban wastewater systems: quantifying the relative contribution of sewer systems. Water Res 77:35–48 · DOI
  73. Rothwell A, Ridoutt B, Page G, Bellotti W (2015) Feeding and housing the urban population: environmental impacts at the peri-urban interface under different land-use scenarios. Land Use Policy 48:377–388 · DOI
  74. Schiopu N,Mailhac A,Beloin-Saint-Pierre D,Lasvaux S,Sibiude G,Chevalier J (2014) A hybrid methodology for the environmental assessment of anthropic systems in urban areas. World Sustainable Building, 2014 Barcelona Conference
  75. Seto KC, Dhakal S, Bigio A, Blanco H, Delgado G C, Dewar D et al (2014) Human settlements, infrastructure and spatial planning. In: Edenhofer O et al (eds) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York. Available at: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_chapter12.pdf
  76. Shahraeeni M, Ahmed S, Malek K, Van Drimmelen B, Kjeang E (2015) Life cycle emissions and cost of transportation systems: case study on diesel and natural gas for light duty trucks in municipal fleet operations. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 24:26–34 · DOI
  77. Sibiude G, Mailhac A, Herfray G, Schiopu N, Lebert A, Togo G, Villien P, Peuportier B, Valean C (2016) LCA enhancement perspectives to facilitate scaling up from building to territory. In: Sustainable Built Environment (SBE) Regional Conference, Zurich, June 15–17, 2016
  78. Simon B, Tamaska L, Kovats N (2010) Analysis of global and local environmental impacts of bus transport by LCA methodologies. Hung J Ind Chem 38(2):155–158
  79. Slagstad H, Brattebø H (2012) LCA for household waste management when planning a new urban settlement. Waste Manag 32:1482–1490 · DOI
  80. Slagstad H, Brattebø H (2014) Life cycle assessment of the water and wastewater system in Trondheim, Norway—a case study: case study. Urban Water J 11:323–334 · DOI
  81. Spatari S, Yu Z, Montalto FA (2011) Life cycle implications of urban green infrastructure. Environ Pollut 159:2174–2179 · DOI
  82. Stephan A, Athanassiadis A (2016) Quantifying and mapping embodied environmental requirements of urban building stocks. Build Environ 114:187–202 · DOI
  83. Su M, Chen C, Yang Z (2016) Urban energy structure optimization at the sector scale: considering environmental impact based on life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 112:1464–1474 · DOI
  84. Teixeira CA, Russo M, Matos C, Bentes I (2014) Evaluation of operational, economic, and environmental performance of mixed and selective collection of municipal solid waste: Porto case study. Waste Manag Res 32:1210–1218 · DOI
  85. Teodosiu C, Barjoveanu G, Sluser BR, Popa SAE, Trofin O (2016) Environmental assessment of municipal wastewater discharges: a comparative study of evaluation methods. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:395–411 · DOI
  86. Trigaux D, Wijnants L, De Troyer F, Allacker K (2017) Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of road infrastructure in residential neighbourhoods. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:938–951 · DOI
  87. Uchea J, Martinez A, Castellano C, Subiela V (2013) Life cycle analysis of urban water cycle in two Spanish areas: inland city and island area. Desalin Water Treat 51:280–291 · DOI
  88. Ulgiati S, Ascione M, Bargigli S, Cherubini F, Franzese PP, Raugei M, Viglia S, Zucaro A (2011) Material, energy and environmental performance of technological and social systems under a Life Cycle Assessment perspective. Ecol Model 222:176–189 · DOI
  89. United Nations (2012) World urbanization prospects: the 2011 revision, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. United Nations, New York · DOI
  90. Vedrenne M, Pérez J, Lumbreras J, Rodríguez ME (2014) Life cycle assessment as a policy-support tool: the case of taxis in the city of Madrid. Energy Policy 66:185–197 · DOI
  91. Yetano Roche M, Lechtenbohmer S, Fischedick M, Grone M-C, Xia C, Dienst C (2014) Concepts and methodologies for measuring the sustainability of cities. Annu Rev Environ Resour 39:519–547 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mirabella, N., Allacker, K., & Sala, S.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • European Commission (BE)
Corresponding author
Mirabella, Nadia
Venue
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Published
2018-05-15
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
1174-1193
ISSN
  • 0948-3349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7502
OpenAlex
W2804209811
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
Keywords
life cycle assessment, urban scale, life cycle thinking, system boundaries, functional units, data granularity, life cycle inventory, impact assessment methodology, hybrid approach, urban sustainability, built environment, energy systems, waste management, water sector, transportation, consumption patterns, urban ecosystems, research agenda, environmental hotspots, urbanization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review