The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Serendipity in Recommender Systems: A Systematic Literature Review
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Therefore, to balance out familiarity, diversity and novelty, it is necessary to consider the inclusion of serendipitous recommendations that are unexpected but still can be relevant (Ziarani and Ravanmehr 2021).”
From AdaptUI: A Framework for the development of Adaptive User Interfaces in Smart Product-Service Systems (2024) · cites this paper as Ziarani and Ravanmehr 2021
Citations
Cites
Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/371920.372071 · Cited by 9,135
Neural Collaborative Filtering
He, X., Liao, L., Zhang, H., Nie, L., Hu, X., & Chua, T. (2017) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3038912.3052569 · Cited by 7,385
Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering—A Systematic Literature Review
Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009 · Cited by 4,537
The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation.
Loewenstein, G. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75 · Cited by 2,738
Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update
Petersen, K., Vakkalanka, S., & Kuzniarz, L. (2015) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007 · Cited by 2,669
Recommender Systems: Introduction and Challenges
Ricci, F., Rokach, L., & Shapira, B. (2015) · Recommender Systems Handbook · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_1 · Cited by 894
Kaminskas, M., & Bridge, D. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/2926720 · Cited by 465
A systematic review and taxonomy of explanations in decision support and recommender systems
Nunes, I., & Jannach, D. (2017) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-017-9195-0 · Cited by 416
A survey of serendipity in recommender systems
Kotkov, D., Wang, S., & Veijalainen, J. (2016) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2016.08.014 · Cited by 360
News recommender systems – Survey and roads ahead
Karimi, M., Jannach, D., & Jugovac, M. (2018) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2018.04.008 · Cited by 337
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–123 of 123
Optimizing Reachability in Graph-Based Recommender Systems
Martínez, A., Cinus, F., Bonchi, F., & Vitria, J. M. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3744658
THE IMPACT OF THE IT AFFORDANCES OF LIVE STREAMING ON CONSUMER’S IMPULSIVE BUYING TENDENCY
Luo, H., & Dong, X. (2025) · The EUrASEANs journal on global socio-economic dynamics · doi:10.35678/2539-5645.4(53).2025.220-231 · Cited by 1
Hertz, A., Kuflik, T., & Tuval, N. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2546044
Determinants of Users' Chance-Seeking Behavior in Search-Based Recommendation
Ninomiya, Y., Sone, Y., Miwa, K., Sumi, Y., Nakanishi, R., Mitsuda, E., Sato, K., & Odashima, T. (2025) · ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys) · doi:10.1145/3705328.3748019
Exploring the Potential of Sound Leakage for Sharing Music
Aoki, H., Miyashita, H., & Nishimoto, K. (2025) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2025.09.474
Tokutake, Y., Okamoto, K., Harada, K., Shibata, A., & Karube, K. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3746252.3760911 · Cited by 2
Maximizing Diverse Information Exposure in Content-Based Social Networks
Colin, J., & Maniu, S. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-72449-1_1
Glücklicher Zufall durch Digitalisierung (ortsgebundener) Gemeinschaften: Eine Fallstudie
Reh, S., & Engelhardt, C. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-72004-2_15
Kreft, J. (2025) · Roczniki Kulturoznawcze · doi:10.18290/rkult25164.2 · Cited by 1
Enhancing Serendipity by Incorporating User Control of Social Information in a Recommender System
Jeon, G., Hong, J., Kim, S., & Lee, S. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2619625
User Fairness in Recommender Systems Using Beyond-Accuracy Basket Quality Metrics
Bhaumik, D., Dey, D., Bril, M. T., & Stoica, V. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-15638-9_17
Deep Natural Language Processing for User Representation
de Gabriac, C. G. D. F. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/f1d99786zd4d3z4d46z9b86z5de95a2b3290
Adaptive weighting-based hybrid recommender system: self-learning adaptive recommendation (SL-ARec)
Çakır, M. E., Çetinkaya, Z., Horasan, F., & Yurttakal, A. H. (2026) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3856 · Cited by 1
Tran, H. M. N., Que, A. P. N., & Nguyen, T. T. (2026) · International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Communication Systems (ICKECS) · doi:10.1109/ickecs70176.2026.11527869
Purnomo, H. D., Christioko, B. V., Kristianto, B., & Sembiring, I. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6962540
Improving Recommendation Serendipity by Chain-of-Thought Prompting in Large Language Models
Zheng, Q., Wu, H., Chen, H., Liu, Y., Xiao, B., Zhong, G., Hu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2026) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Materials (ICAIM) · doi:10.1109/icaim69488.2026.11601833
Music Was My First Love: Biographic Resonance Makes Everyday Music Listening Meaningful
Dietrich, F., Ernst, A., Rohr, B., Scharkow, M., & Reinecke, L. (2026) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502261468400
Wang, E. J., Berthon, P. R., & John, J. (2026) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-12-2025-0888
A Survey of Causal Learning in Graph-Based Recommender Systems
Yu, D., Li, Q., Soundararaj, B., Pettit, C. J., & Xu, G. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3840748
Khan, I. A., Ausaf, A., & Khan, S. (2026) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2026.2725008
Synchronistic Experience as Salience Alignment in Biosemiotic Feedback Systems
McCoss, A. M. (2026) · Biosemiotics · doi:10.1007/s12304-026-09663-z
Bhatia, P. S., Singh, J., & Kumar, A. (2026) · ShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts · doi:10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i2.2026.9244
Recommender Systems Evaluation
Bellogín, A., & Said, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_110162-2
Metadata
- Authors
- Ziarani, R. J., & Ravanmehr, R.
- Affiliations
- Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Ravanmehr, Reza
- ORCID
- Ravanmehr, Reza
- Venue
- Journal of Computer Science and Technology
- Published
- 2021-03-31
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 375-396
- ISSN
- 1000-9000 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-4749
- OpenAlex
- W3154445493
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 99
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 2.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Computer Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
- Keywords
- serendipity, recommender systems, serendipitous recommendation, novelty, recommendation diversity, recommendation relevance, recommendation evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review