Cited by 3Kantian Philosophy and Modern InterpretationsPhilosophical Ethics and TheoryCritical Theory and Philosophy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Volitional Self-Contradiction Interpretation of Kant’s Formula of Universal Law: A Response to Kleingeld

Open access
Walschots, Michael·2023·Philosophia

Abstract

In this paper I critically engage with Pauline Kleingeld’s ‘volitional self-contradiction’ interpretation of Kant’s formula of universal law. I make three remarks: first, I seek to clarify what it means for a contradiction to be volitional as opposed to logical; second, I suggest that her interpretation might need to be closer to Korsgaard’s ‘practical contradiction’ interpretation than she thinks; and third, I suggest that more work needs to be done to explain how a volitional self-contradiction generates both a ‘contradiction in conception’ and a ‘contradiction in will.’

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11406-023-00621-4

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kant, I. (1900 ff.). Gesammelte Schriften (Akademie Ausgabe). Vol. 1–22 edited by Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vol. 23 edited by Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Vol. 24 ff. edited by Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen.

Metadata

Authors
Walschots, M.
Affiliations
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Walschots, Michael
Venue
Philosophia
Published
2023-01-28
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
483-497
ISSN
  • 0048-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-9274
OpenAlex
W4318406789
Cited by
3
References
12
Citations by year
2023: 3
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
  • Digitalen Hochschulbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt (Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences (Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences)
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung (Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung)
  • Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Theory and Philosophy
Keywords
Immanuel Kant, Formula of Universal Law, Korsgaard, moral law, Kantian ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review