Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 90 · Cited by 388
- Authors
- Ku, K. Y. L., & Ho, I. T.
- Affiliations
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Ku, Kelly Y. L.
- ORCID
- Ku, Kelly Y. L.
- Venue
- Metacognition and Learning
- Published
- 2010-07-21
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 251-267
- ISSN
- 1556-1623 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-1631
- OpenAlex
- W2039454245
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 12.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Metacognition and Learning (publishedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- metacognitive strategies, critical thinking, metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive regulation, planning strategies, think-aloud, university students, thinking dispositions, instructional practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
