The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the metacognitive awareness inventory using empirical factor-structure evidence
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787 · Cited by 39,094
(1998) · Cited by 36,049
The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action
Checkoway, B. N., & Schön, D. A. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324262 · Cited by 21,311
The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action
Stewart, C. J. (1984) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/0738-3991(84)90022-3 · Cited by 19,751
Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research
Brown, T. A. (2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2769 · Cited by 15,621
(1999) · Cited by 12,812
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282 · cited 4×
“Using established theory (Brown 1987; Flavell 1979; Jacobs and Paris 1987), Schraw and Dennison (1994) created these two subscales from a larger pool of items they developed to measure the subcomponents theorized to constitute each, with the knowledge dimension including items addressing…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe standards for educational and psychological testing.
Eignor, D. R. (2013) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/14047-013 · Cited by 6,985
Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?
Hmelo‐Silver, C. E. (2004) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1023/b:edpr.0000034022.16470.f3 · Cited by 5,552
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Adams, R. J., Wu, M. L., Haldane, S. A., & Xun, S. X. (2012). ConQuest (version 3.0.1) [computer software]. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). MPlus user’s guide (Seventh ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
- RincónGallardo, T. J. (2009). The effect of the use of learning journals on the development of metacognition in undergraduate students. (doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database. (accession no. 3389888).
- Tobias, S., & Everson, H. (2000). Assessing metacognitive knowledge monitoring. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 147–222). Lincoln: Buros Institute.
- Vallin, L. M. (2017). Metacognition as a pedagogical approach to improve students’ use of metacognitive strategies. Honolulu: (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences
Fleur, D. S., Bert Bredeweg, A., & van den Bos, W. (2021) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-021-00089-5 · Cited by 265
Craig, K., Hale, D. R., Grainger, C., & Stewart, M. E. (2020) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-020-09222-y · Cited by 191
Norman, E., Pfuhl, G., Sæle, R. G., Svartdal, F., Låg, T., & Dahl, T. I. (2019) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1177/1089268019883821 · Cited by 174
Alt, D., & Raichel, N. (2020) · Reflective Practice · doi:10.1080/14623943.2020.1716708 · Cited by 107
Metacognitive awareness in relation to university students’ learning profiles
Tuononen, T., Hyytinen, H., Räisänen, M., Hailikari, T. K., & Parpala, A. (2022) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-022-09314-x · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrison, G. M., & Vallin, L. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Harrison, George M.
- ORCID
- Harrison, George M.
- Venue
- Metacognition and Learning
- Published
- 2017-07-24
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-38
- ISSN
- 1556-1623 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-1631
- OpenAlex
- W2738454914
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 7.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Metacognition and Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- Metacognitive Awareness Inventory, metacognition, metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive regulation, factor structure, instrument validation, item response theory, score calculation, time invariance, undergraduate students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
