Cited by 29Memory Processes and InfluencesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

How to assess the contributions of processing fluency and beliefs to the formation of judgments of learning: methods and pitfalls

Yang, Chunliang, Yu, Rongjun, Hu, Xiao, Luo, Liang, Huang, Tina S.-T., Shanks, David R.·2021·Metacognition and Learning

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11409-020-09254-4

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, C., Yu, R., Hu, X., Luo, L., Huang, T. S.-T., & Shanks, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Yang, Chunliang
Venue
Metacognition and Learning
Published
2021-01-08
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
319-343
ISSN
  • 1556-1623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-1631
OpenAlex
W3118969219
Cited by
29
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Metacognition and Learning (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of China (31671130, 32000742)
  • United Kingdom Economic and Social Research Council (ES/P009522/1)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2019NTSS28)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
judgments of learning, processing fluency, metacognition, metacognitive accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review