Caregiver, Child, Family, and Service System Contributors to Caregiver Strain in Two Child Mental Health Service Systems
Abstract
Children's mental health researchers are increasingly recognizing the importance of caregiver strain (i.e., the impact on families of caring for children with emotional and behavioral disorders). This study examined the caregiver, child, family, and service variables associated with caregiver strain with special attention to the role of barriers to care. These relationships were compared across enrollees in a managed care Medicaid and a traditional fee-for-service system. Findings indicated that severity of child problems was the most consistent predictor of caregiver strain. Although there was considerable similarity in the variables associated with caregiver strain across the two systems, important differences were also evident. Caregivers in the managed care setting were significantly more likely to report provider/payer-related barriers to care. Provider/payer barriers predicted strain in the managed care sample. In the fee-for-service system, barriers related to family perceptions and inconvenient location and appointment times were significant predictors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a well-documented positive association between youth problem severity and caregiver reported parenting strain.
“There is a well-documented positive association between youth problem severity and caregiver reported parenting strain [14,16].”
From Dimensions of caregiver strain may partially mediate the relationship between youth symptomology and counseling utilization among Latinxs (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Parents often report experiencing caregiver strain in response to the emergence of youth emotional and/or behavioral problems.
“Parents often report experiencing caregiver strain in response to the emergence of youth emotional and/or behavioral problems [14,15].”
From Dimensions of caregiver strain may partially mediate the relationship between youth symptomology and counseling utilization among Latinxs (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 102
- Authors
- Brannan, A. M., & Heflinger, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brannan, Ana María
- ORCID
- Brannan, Ana María
- Venue
- The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
- Published
- 2006-09-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 408-422
- ISSN
- 1094-3412 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-3308
- OpenAlex
- W2061677691
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r21mh067905-02)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R21 MH 067905-02)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- caregiver burden, child mental health, emotional and behavioral disorders, barriers to care, fee-for-service, family caregiving, family perceptions, appointment access
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Managed Care Programs, Stress, Psychological, United States, Caregivers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review