The Effect of Social Networks and Social Support on Mental Health Services Use, Following a Life Event, among the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area Cohort
Abstract
The study examined the association between life events and mental health services use, accounting for social networks and social support. Main and stress-buffering effects were estimated using longitudinal data from the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area cohort (1,920 participants in 1993-1996, of whom 1,071 were re-interviewed in 2004-2005). Following a life event, the odds of using general medical services were increased by almost 50% when there was increased social support from spouse/partner (referral function). The odds of using mental health services within general health setup were reduced by 60% when there was increased support from relatives (stress-reduction function). Increased social support from friends and relatives was associated with a 40-60% decreased odds of using specialty psychiatric services after experiencing different life events (stress-reduction function). Overall, social support rather than social networks were more strongly associated with increased mental health service use following a life event. The implications for service delivery and program development are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 58 · Cited by 93
- Authors
- Maulik, P. K., Eaton, W. W., & Bradshaw, C. P.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Maulik, Pallab K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
- Published
- 2010-02-02
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-50
- ISSN
- 1094-3412 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-3308
- OpenAlex
- W2115792656
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH047447)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 026652, R01DA026652)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
- Keywords
- social support, social networks, mental health service utilization, life events, stress buffering, stress reduction, general medical services, relatives, friends, spouses
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Catchment Area, Health, Family, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Prospective Studies, Social Class, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Baltimore, Cohort Studies, Friends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review