Cited by 93Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealth disparities and outcomesHealth and Well-being Studies

The Effect of Social Networks and Social Support on Mental Health Services Use, Following a Life Event, among the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area Cohort

Maulik, Pallab K., Eaton, William W., Bradshaw, Catherine P.·2011·The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research

Abstract

The study examined the association between life events and mental health services use, accounting for social networks and social support. Main and stress-buffering effects were estimated using longitudinal data from the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area cohort (1,920 participants in 1993-1996, of whom 1,071 were re-interviewed in 2004-2005). Following a life event, the odds of using general medical services were increased by almost 50% when there was increased social support from spouse/partner (referral function). The odds of using mental health services within general health setup were reduced by 60% when there was increased support from relatives (stress-reduction function). Increased social support from friends and relatives was associated with a 40-60% decreased odds of using specialty psychiatric services after experiencing different life events (stress-reduction function). Overall, social support rather than social networks were more strongly associated with increased mental health service use following a life event. The implications for service delivery and program development are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11414-009-9205-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 58 · Cited by 93

Authors
Maulik, P. K., Eaton, W. W., & Bradshaw, C. P.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Maulik, Pallab K.
Venue
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Published
2010-02-02
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
29-50
ISSN
  • 1094-3412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3308
OpenAlex
W2115792656
Cited by
93
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH047447)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 026652, R01DA026652)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
social support, social networks, mental health service utilization, life events, stress buffering, stress reduction, general medical services, relatives, friends, spouses
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Catchment Area, Health, Family, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Prospective Studies, Social Class, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Baltimore, Cohort Studies, Friends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review