Inside versus outside the science classroom: examining the positionality of two female science teachers at the boundaries of science education
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20237 · Cited by 2,433 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Czerniawski, G. (2023) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3902 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Teo, T. W.
- Affiliations
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Teo, Tang Wee
- ORCID
- Teo, Tang Wee
- Venue
- Cultural Studies of Science Education
- Published
- 2014-08-30
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 381-402
- ISSN
- 1871-1502 (ISSN-L)
- 1871-1510
- OpenAlex
- W1990336330
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Cultural Studies of Science Education (publishedVersion)
- NIE Digital Repository (National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Keywords
- positionality, third-wave feminism, science education, power imbalance, social stereotyping, teacher-student relationship, teacher identity, teacher professional development, curriculum development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
