Cited by 14Machine Learning in BioinformaticsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Large language models transform biological research: from architecture to utilization

Open access
Wang, Tao, Luo, Zeyu·2025·Science China Information Sciences

Abstract

Recently, numerous large language models (LLMs) have emerged as foundational models, reshaping biological data modeling and achieving remarkable breakthroughs in both discriminative and generative tasks. The success of these models is largely attributed to the inherent similarities between natural language and biological data, such as DNA, RNA, and amino acid sequences. Through pre-training and fine-tuning phases, LLMs have demonstrated their ability to effectively model these biological datasets. Additionally, while protein structures and RNA-seq expression data are not inherently sequential, they can still be modeled and predicted effectively by LLMs based on the Transformer architecture. Previous research has predominantly focused on architectural innovations in LLMs and their applications to sequential data across various domains. However, there is a notable lack of systematic reviews addressing the reasons and methods behind LLM modifications for fitting biological omics data, particularly for non-sequential data types. Furthermore, comprehensive analyses of LLM applications in synthetic biology remain limited. We first systematically review representative LLMs in the biological domain. Next, we delve into their applications across the genome, transcriptome, and proteome fields, detailing the goals, processes, datasets, and methodologies involved. Finally, we discuss the challenges of applying LLMs to biological omics data and fundamental scientific research. In summary, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the technical and conceptual advances in this field, as well as an essential resource for researchers exploring the diverse applications of LLMs across various biological disciplines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11432-024-4466-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 177 · Cited by 14

Authors
Wang, T., & Luo, Z.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
  • Northeast Forestry University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Tao
Venue
Science China Information Sciences
Published
2025-06-19
Volume
68
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 1869-1919 (ISSN-L)
  • 1674-733X
OpenAlex
W4411571587
Cited by
14
References
177
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Science China Information Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
large language models, transformer models, protein structure prediction, synthetic biology, genome, transcriptome, proteome, LLM fine-tuning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review