Cited by 10Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsHomelessness and Social Issues

Abstinence Versus Harm Reduction: Considering Follow-up and Aftercare in First Nations Addictions Treatment

van der Woerd, Kimberly A., Cox, David N., Reading, Jeff, Kmetic, Andrew·2010·International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11469-009-9266-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Woerd, K. A., Cox, D. N., Reading, J., & Kmetic, A.
Affiliations
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
Published
2010-01-08
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
374-389
ISSN
  • 1557-1874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1882
OpenAlex
W1965469277
Cited by
10
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
harm reduction, abstinence, follow-up care, follow-up, First Nations, residential treatment, relapse, social support, participatory evaluation, Alert Bay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review