Abstinence Versus Harm Reduction: Considering Follow-up and Aftercare in First Nations Addictions Treatment
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In total, two studies (11.11%) were rated a bias rating of 2 (serious bias).
“two studies (11.11%) were rated a bias rating of 2 (serious bias) (Hanson and Pourier, 2015; van der Woerd et al., 2010).”
From Culturally tailored substance use interventions for Indigenous people of North America: a systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as van der Woerd et al., 2010
Of the nine nonrandomized studies, two (22.22%) were rated a bias rating of 2 (serious bias).
“Finally, two studies (22.22%) were rated a bias rating of 2 (serious bias).”
From Culturally tailored substance use interventions for Indigenous people of North America: a systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as van der Woerd et al., 2010
Cites
What predicts relapse? Prospective testing of antecedent models
Miller, W. R., Westerberg, V. S., Harris, R. J., & Tonigan, J. S. (1996) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1996.tb02336.x · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Richer, A. M. S., & Roddy, A. L. (2023) · The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice · doi:10.1108/jmhtep-07-2021-0088 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- van der Woerd, K. A., Cox, D. N., Reading, J., & Kmetic, A.
- Affiliations
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Venue
- International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
- Published
- 2010-01-08
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 374-389
- ISSN
- 1557-1874 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1882
- OpenAlex
- W1965469277
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
- Keywords
- harm reduction, abstinence, follow-up care, follow-up, First Nations, residential treatment, relapse, social support, participatory evaluation, Alert Bay
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review