Mindfulness-enhanced cognitive behavior therapy for problem gambling: a controlled pilot study
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent systematic review supports the effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based interventions for substance and behavioral addictions.
“a recent systematic review supports the effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based interventions for substance and behavioral addictions (Toneatto et al., 2014; McIntosh et al., 2016; Sancho et al., 2018).”
From Efficacy of an internet-based psychological intervention for problem gambling and gambling disorder: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2021) · cites this paper as Toneatto et al., 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 50
- Authors
- Toneatto, T., Pillai, S., & Courtice, E. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Toneatto, Tony
- Venue
- International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
- Published
- 2014-02-15
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197-205
- ISSN
- 1557-1874 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1882
- OpenAlex
- W1983897000
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- mindfulness meditation, problem gambling, cognitive behavioral therapy, gambling addiction, gambling urges, psychiatric symptoms, maintenance of treatment effects, irrational beliefs, cognitive distortions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
