Cited by 20Eating Disorders and BehaviorsImpact of Technology on AdolescentsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Are the Use and Addiction to Social Networks Associated with Disordered Eating Among Adolescents? Findings from the EHDLA Study

Open access
López-Gil, José Francisco, Chen, Sitong, Jiménez-López, Estela, Abellán-Huerta, José, Herrera-Gutiérrez, Eva, Royo, Josefa María Panisello, Mesas, Arthur Eumann, Tárraga-López, Pedro J.·2024·International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine whether the use and addiction of social networks are associated with disordered eating in Spanish adolescents. A cross-sectional study was carried out using data from the Eating Healthy and Daily Life Activities study. The final sample included 653 adolescents (44.0% boys). Social network use (i.e., Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok) was evaluated by a single item scale with multiple response options. The Short Social Networks Addiction Scale-6 Symptoms was used to determine addiction to social networks. Disordered eating behaviors were assessed with the Sick, Control, One, Fat, Food scale. Adolescents with high social network use had greater odds of disordered eating (odds ratio [OR] = 1.88, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.17–3.02). Adolescents with high social network addictive behaviors also showed a higher likelihood of presenting disordered eating (OR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.34–3.12). Social network use and addiction must be considered factors related to disordered eating among adolescents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11469-023-01081-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eleven studies used self-developed questionnaires for outcome evaluation, of which only six paired it with standardized measures.

    “Eleven studies used self-developed questionnaires for outcome evaluation [42, 67–72, 74, 80–82], of which only six paired it with standardized measures [67–69, 71, 72, 80, 81].”

    From Scrolling through adolescence: a systematic review of the impact of TikTok on adolescent mental health (2025) · cites this paper as [81]

    The Social Networks (Independent Variable) section describes a study-specific social-network-use score, and the Disordered Eating (Dependent Variable) section says the study used the validated SCOFF questionnaire to assess its outcome. Thus this paper supports the use of a standardized measure alongside a study-specific measure, but not the characterization of its outcome questionnaire as self-developed. As a single study, it also cannot substantiate the totals of eleven and six studies. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Time spent on TikTok has not been clearly linked to a higher likelihood of eating disorders and body dissatisfaction.

    “While time spent on TikTok has not been clearly linked to an higher likelihood of eating disorders and body dissatisfaction [73, 81]”

    From Scrolling through adolescence: a systematic review of the impact of TikTok on adolescent mental health (2025) · cites this paper as [81]

    Table 2 reports no statistically significant association between self-reported TikTok use and disordered eating among the Spanish adolescents studied. However, the Social Networks (Independent Variable) section describes a rating of use, not time spent, and the study did not assess body dissatisfaction as an outcome. Those parts of the claim are not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 20

Authors
López-Gil, J. F., Chen, S., Jiménez-López, E., Abellán-Huerta, J., Herrera-Gutiérrez, E., Royo, J. M. P., Mesas, A. E., & Tárraga-López, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Victoria University (AU)
  • Santa Lucía University General Hospital (ES)
  • Universidad de Murcia (ES)
  • Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR)
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
Published
2023-05-26
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
3775-3789
ISSN
  • 1557-1874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1882
OpenAlex
W4378471923
Cited by
20
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Academica-e (Universidad Pública de Navarra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Universidad Pública de Navarra
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
social network use, social media addiction, disordered eating, adolescents, eating disorders, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, Spanish adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review