Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Classifying changes in LN-18 glial cell morphology: a supervised machine learning approach to analyzing cell microscopy data via FIJI and WEKA

Mbiki, Sarah, McClendon, Jerome, Alexander-Bryant, Angela, Gilmore, Jordon·2020·Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing

Abstract

In cell-based research, the process of visually monitoring cells generates large image datasets that need to be evaluated for quantifiable information in order to track the effectiveness of treatments in vitro. With the traditional, end-point assay-based approach being error-prone, and existing computational approaches being complex, we tested existing machine learning frameworks to find methods that are relatively simple, yet powerful enough to accomplish the goal of analyzing cell microscopy data. This paper details the machine learning pipeline for pixel-based classification and object-based classification. Furthermore, it compares the performances of three classifiers. The classifiers evaluated were the fast-random forest (RF), the sequential minimal optimization (SMO), and the Bayesian network (BN). Images were first preprocessed using smoothing and contrast methods found in FIJI. For pixel-based classification, the preprocessed images were fed into the Trainable Waikato Segmentation (TWS). For object-based classification, training and classification were conducted within the Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis (WEKA) interface. All classifiers' performance was evaluated using the WEKA experimental explorer. In terms of performance, the BN had the lowest classification accuracy for both the pixel-based and object-based model. The object-based SMO classifier had the best performance with the lowest mean absolute error of 0.05. The TWS and WEKA interface allows user…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11517-020-02177-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Sommer C, Gerlich DW (2013) Machine learning in cell biology – teaching computers to recognize phenotypes. J Cell Sci 126. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.123604 · DOI
  2. Baatz M, Arini N, Schäpe A, Binnig G, Linssen B (2006) Object-oriented image analysis for high content screening: detailed quantification of cells and sub cellular structures with the cellenger software. Cytometry Part A:69. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20289 · DOI
  3. Arganda-Carreras I, Kaynig V, Rueden C, Eliceiri KW, Schindelin J, Cardona A, Sebastian Seung H (2017) Trainable Weka segmentation: a machine learning tool for microscopy pixel classification. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 33. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx180 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Sonka M, Hlavac V, Boyle R (1993) Image pre-processing. In: Image Processing, Analysis and Machine Vision. Springer US, Boston · DOI
  5. Chitradevi B, Srimanthi P (2014) An overview on image processing techniques. ISRN Signal Process 2. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/496701 · DOI
  6. Maini R, Aggarwal H (2009) Study and Comparison of Various Image Edge Detection Techniques. In: International Journal of Image Processing (IJIP)
  7. Pérez-Benito C, Morillas S, Jordán C, Conejero JA (2017) Smoothing vs. sharpening of color images - together or separated. Appl Math Nonlinear Sci. https://doi.org/10.21042/AMNS.2017.1.00025 · DOI
  8. Singh A, Yadav S, Singh N (2016) Contrast enhancement and brightness preservation using global-local image enhancement techniques. In: 2016 4th International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing, PDGC 2016 · DOI
  9. Blaschke T, Burnett C, Pekkarinen A (2004) Image segmentation methods for object-based analysis and classification. In: Jong SMD, Meer FDV (eds) Remote Sensing Image Analysis: Including the Spatial Domain, pp.211-236. Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2560-0_12 · DOI
  10. Anjna E, Rajandeep Kaur E (2017) Review of image segmsentation technique
  11. Shariff A, Kangas J, Coelho LP, Quinn S, Murphy RF (2010) Automated image analysis for high-content screening and analysis. J Biomol Screen 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087057110370894 · DOI
  12. Kotsiantis SB (2007) Supervised machine learning: a review of classification techniques
  13. Bin Othman MF, Yau TMS (2007) Comparison of Different Classification Techniques Using WEKA for Breast Cancer. In: Ibrahim F, Osman NAA, Usman J, Kadri NA (eds) 3rd Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Biomedical Engineering 2006. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 15. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68017-8_131 · DOI
  14. Kelner R, Lerner B (2012) Learning Bayesian network classifiers by risk minimization. In: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning · DOI
  15. Frank E, Hall M, Holmes G, Kirkby R, Pfahringer B, Witten IH, Trigg L Chapter 1 WEKA a machine learning workbench for data mining
  16. Soille P, Vincent LM (1990) Determining watersheds in digital pictures via flooding simulations. In: Visual Communications and Image Processing '90. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.24211 · DOI
  17. Li W, Mao KZ, Zhang H, Chai T (2010) Selection of gabor filters for improved texture feature extraction. In: Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP · DOI
  18. Krishan A (2012) Evaluation of Gabor filter parameters for image enhancement and segmentation. In: International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering & Technology (IJARCET), Volume 1, Issue 7. ISSN: 2278 – 1323
  19. Bai Y, Guo L, Jin L, Huang Q (2009) A novel feature extraction method using pyramid histogram of orientation gradients for smile recognition. In: Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP
  20. Frank E, Hall MA, Witten IH (2016) The WEKA Workbench. Online Appendix for “Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques". Morgan Kaufmann, Fourth Edition

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mbiki, S., McClendon, J., Alexander-Bryant, A., & Gilmore, J.
Venue
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Published
2020-04-21
Volume
58
Issue
7
Pages
1419-1430
ISSN
  • 0140-0118
  • 1741-0444
Cited by
10
References
1
Language
en
Funders
Transformative Initiative for Generating Extramural Research (TIGER) Grant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review