Cited by 101Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions

Toxicities with immune checkpoint inhibitors: emerging priorities from disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system

Open access
Raschi, Emanuel, Mazzarella, Alessandra, Antonazzo, Ippazio Cosimo, Bendinelli, Nicolò, Forcesi, Emanuele, Tuccori, Marco, Moretti, Ugo, Poluzzi, Elisabetta +1 more·2019·Targeted Oncology

Abstract

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including antibodies targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA4) and programmed cell death 1 or its ligand (PD1/PDL1), elicit different immune-related adverse events (irAEs), but their global safety is incompletely characterized. Objective The aim of this study was to characterize the spectrum, frequency, and clinical features of ICI-related adverse events (AEs) reported to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Patients and methods AEs from FAERS (up to June 2018) recording ICIs (ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab) as suspect were extracted. Comprehensive disproportionality analyses were performed through the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI), using other oncological drugs as comparison. An overview of systematic reviews (OoSRs) was also undertaken to identify irAEs with consistent positive associations. Results ICIs were recorded in 47,266 reports, submitted mainly by consumers receiving monotherapy with anti-PD1/PDL1 drugs. Three areas of toxicity emerged from both disproportionality analysis and the OoSRs (32 studies): endocrine (N = 2863; ROR = 6.91; 95% CI 6.60-7.23), hepatobiliary (2632; 1.33; 1.28-1.39), and respiratory disorders (7240; 1.04; 1.01-1.06). Different reporting patterns emerged for anti-CTLA4 drugs (e.g., hypophysitis, adrenal insufficiency, hypopituitarism, and prescribed overdose) and anti-PD1/PDL1 agents (e.g., pneumonitis, cholangitis, vanishing bile duct syndrome, tumor pseudoprogression, and inappropriate schedule of drug administration). No increased reporting emerged when comparing combination with monotherapy regimens, but multiple hepatobiliary/endocrine/respiratory irAEs were recorded. Conclusions This parallel approach through contemporary post-marketing analysis and OoSRs confirmed that ICIs are associated with a multitude of irAEs, with different reporting patterns between anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1/PDL1 medications. Close clinical monitoring is warranted to early diagnose and timely manage irAEs, especially respiratory, endocrine, and hepatic toxicities, which warrant further characterization; patient- and drug-related risk factors should be assessed through analytical pharmaco-epidemiological studies and prospective multicenter registries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11523-019-00632-w

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hypothyroidism and thyrotoxicosis are mainly associated with anti-PD1/PDL1 agents, especially in combination with anti-CTLA4, while hypophysitis, adrenal insufficiency, and hypopituitarism are more frequently reported with anti-CTLA4 drugs such as ipilimumab.

    “While hypothyroidism and thyrotoxicosis have been mainly associated with anti-PD1/PDL1 agents (especially in a combination regimen with anti-CTLA4, co-occurring with hepatobiliary and respiratory irAEs), hypophysitis, AI, and hypopituitarism were more frequently reported with anti-CTLA4 drugs (ipilimumab) (25, 26).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raschi, E., Mazzarella, A., Antonazzo, I. C., Bendinelli, N., Forcesi, E., Tuccori, M., Moretti, U., Poluzzi, E., & De Ponti, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • University of Verona (IT)
Corresponding author
Raschi, Emanuel
Venue
Targeted Oncology
Published
2019-03-29
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
205-221
ISSN
  • 1776-2596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1776-260X
OpenAlex
W2925933490
Cited by
101
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 6
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Targeted Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Keywords
immune checkpoint inhibitors, immune-related adverse events, drug safety, anti-CTLA-4, endocrine toxicity, hepatobiliary toxicity, pneumonitis, cholangitis, hypophysitis, adrenal insufficiency, hypopituitarism, disproportionality analysis, FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, ipilimumab
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Immunotherapy, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Young Adult, Cell Cycle Checkpoints, Pharmacovigilance, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review