Collateral Damage: The Health Effects of Invasive Police Encounters in New York City
Open accessAbstract
The health effects of police surveillance practices for the community at-large are unknown. Using microlevel health data from the 2009-2012 New York City Community Health Survey (NYC-CHS) nested within mesolevel data from the 2009-2012 NYC Stop, Question, and Frisk (NYC-SQF) dataset, this study evaluates contextual and ethnoracially variant associations between invasive aspects of pedestrian stops and multiple dimensions of poor health. Results reveal that living in neighborhoods where pedestrian stops are more likely to become invasive is associated with worse health. Living in neighborhoods where stops are more likely to result in frisking show the most consistent negative associations. More limited deleterious effects can be attributed to living in neighborhoods where stops are more likely to involve use of force or in neighborhoods with larger ethnoracial disparities in frisking or use of force. However, the health effects of pedestrian stops vary by ethnoracial group in complex ways. For instance, minorities who live in neighborhoods with a wider ethno racial disparity in police behavior have poorer health outcomes in most respects, but blacks have lower odds of diabetes when they live in neighborhoods where they face a higher risk that a stop will involve use of force by police than do whites. The findings suggest that the consequences of the institutionalization of the carceral state are far-reaching.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Black women, American Indian/Alaska Native men and women, and Latino men all have a higher lifetime risk of being killed by police compared to their White peers.
“Black women, American Indian/Alaska Native men and women, and Latino men all have a higher lifetime risk of being killed by police compared to their White peers (82).”
From Structural Racism and Suicide Prevention for Ethnoracially Minoritized Youth: A Conceptual Framework and Illustration Across Systems (2022) · cites this paper as [82]
Black men are 2.5 times as likely to be killed by police as White men.
“Black men are 2.5 times as likely to be killed by police as White men (82).”
From Structural Racism and Suicide Prevention for Ethnoracially Minoritized Youth: A Conceptual Framework and Illustration Across Systems (2022) · cites this paper as [82]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 273
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Goldberg DT. Racist culture. Blackwell Publishers Cambridge, Mass; 1993.
- Shedd C. What about the other 99%? The broader impact of street stops on minority communities. In: La Vigne N, Lachman P, Matthews A, Neusteter SR, eds. Key issues in the police use of pedestrian stops and searches: discussion papers from an urban institute roundtable. New York,NY: The Urban Institute; 2012: 24-29.
- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Community health survey 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Public use Dataset Accessed on 7/15/2014 2009-2012.
- New York City Police Department. 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 Stop, question, and frisk data. Public use Dataset Accessed on 8/15/2014 2009-2012.
- Authors
- Sewell, A. A., & Jefferson, K. A.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Urban Health
- Published
- 2016-01-15
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 42-67
- ISSN
- 0028-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-3460
- 1468-2869
- PMC
- PMC4824697
- OpenAlex
- W2277316260
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 79.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Urban Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Pennsylvania
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Keywords
- police stops, police use of force, racial and ethnic disparities, neighborhood context, diabetes mellitus, community health, carceral state, New York City
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Black or African American, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New York City, Residence Characteristics, Socioeconomic Factors, Urban Health, Police, Law Enforcement, Black People, White People, Racial Groups, Health Status Disparities, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review