Changes in Attitudes toward Guns and Shootings following Implementation of the Baltimore Safe Streets Intervention
Open accessAbstract
Among youth 15 to 24 years of age, homicide and nonfatal shootings are the leading causes of mortality and morbidity. Urban youth's attitudes and perceptions about the use of gun violence to resolve conflict present a major barrier to efforts to reduce gun homicides and nonfatal shootings. The current investigation extends the existing literature on attitudes toward guns and shootings among high-risk youth ages 18 to 24 by measuring perceived norms and viewpoints regarding gun violence in two analogous Baltimore City neighborhoods pre-implementation and 1-year post-implementation of the Safe Streets intervention (adapted from the CeaseFire/Cure Violence intervention). The Safe Streets intervention is designed for communities with high rates of gun violence and utilizes outreach workers to identify and build trusting relationships with youth ages 15 to 24 who are at greatest risk of being involved in gun violence. The outreach workers also position themselves in the community so that they can rapidly intervene in disputes that have the potential to lead to gun violence. Chi-squared tests and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) were used to examine changes in attitudes toward gun violence 1 year after the implementation of the Safe Streets intervention. There was a statistically significantly improvement in 43 % of the attitudes assessed in the intervention community post-intervention compared to 13 % of the attitudes in the control community. There was a statistically significant improvement in the violent attitudes toward personal conflict resolution scale after implementation of the intervention in both the intervention (b = -0.522, p < 0.001) and control community (b = -0.204, p < 0.032). Exposure to the intervention (e.g., seeing stop shooting signs in your neighborhood) was also associated with the nonviolent attitudes toward conflict scale. Overall, the study found greater improvement in attitudes toward violence in the intervention community following the implementation of the Safe Streets program. These findings offer promising insights into future community violence prevention efforts.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Community interventions involving violence interrupters and outreach workers appear to be an effective means of reducing violent crime through conflict mediation without reliance on police or criminal legal intervention.
“Community interventions involving ' violence interrupters ' and outreach workers also appear to be an effective means of reducing violent crime through con fl ict mediation without reliance on police or criminal legal intervention (Cerd á et al., 2018; Milam et al., 2016; Webster et al., 2013).”
From A call to dismantle systemic racism in criminal legal systems. (2022) · cites this paper as Milam et al., 2016
The Introduction (p. 3) describes outreach workers intervening in disputes and reports prior evaluations associating Cure Violence and Safe Streets with reduced shootings and homicides. The Safe Streets Intervention section (p. 5) documents conflict mediations, but this paper measures attitudes rather than demonstrating that mediation caused a reduction in violent crime. It also does not establish that the intervention operated without reliance on police or criminal legal intervention. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Cure Violence: A Public Health Model to Reduce Gun Violence
Butts, J. A., Roman, C. G., Bostwick, L., & Porter, J. R. (2015) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122509 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Webster, D. W., Whitehill, J. M., Vernick, J. S., & Curriero, F. C. (2013) · Journal of Urban Health · doi:10.1007/s11524-012-9731-5 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Vittes KA, Vernick JS, Webster DW. Legal status and source of offenders’ firearms in states with the least stringent criteria for gun ownership. Inj Prev. 2013; 19: 26–31. · DOI
- Shapiro JP, Dorman RL, Welker CJ, Clough JB. Youth attitudes towards guns and violence: relations with sex, age, ethnic group, and firearm exposure. J Clin Child Psychol. 1998; 27(1): 98–108. · DOI
- Anderson E. The code of the street: decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: WW Norton & Co; 1999.
- Wilkinson DL. Guns, violence and identity among African American and Latino youth. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing; 2003.
- Rich JAN, Jones VC, Haynie DL, Simons-Morton BG, Wright JL, Cheng TL. Factors associated with retaliatory attitudes among African American adolescents who have been assaulted. J Pediatr Psychol. 2007; 32(7): 760–70. · DOI
- Rich JA, Stone DA. The experience of violent injury for young African American men: the meaning of being a sucker. J Gen Intern Med. 1996; 11(6): 77–82. · DOI
- Rich JA, Gray CM. Pathways to recurrent trauma among young black men: traumatic stress, substance use, and the “code of the street”. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95: 816–24. · DOI
- Chang DC, Cornwell EE, Sutton ERH, Yonas MA, Allen F. A multidisciplinary youth violence-prevention initiative: impact on attitudes. J Am Coll Surg. 2005; 201(5): 721–3. · DOI
- Goldberg AJ, Toto JM, Kulp HR, Lloyd ME, Gaughan JP, Seamon MJ, Charles SP. An analysis of innercity students’ attitudes towards violence before and after participation in the “cradle to grave” programme. Injury. 2010; 41: 110–5. · DOI
- Shapiro JP, Dorman RL, Burkey WM. Development and factor analysis of a measure of youth attitudes towards guns and violence. J Clin Child Psychol. 1997; 26: 311–20. · DOI
- Milam AJ, Furr-Holden CDM, Leaf PJ, Webster D. Managing conflicts in urban communities: youth attitudes regarding gun violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2016; Epub ahead of print. · DOI
- Asparouhov T, Muthen B. Exploratory structural equation modeling. Struct Equation Model A Multidisciplinary J. 2009; 16: 397–438. · DOI
- Browne MW. An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behav Res. 2001; 36: 111–50. · DOI
- Marsh HW, Muthén B, Asparouhov T, et al. Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Struct Equation Model A Multidisciplinary J. 2009; 16: 439–76. · DOI · Paper page
- Furr-Holden CDM, Lee MH, Johnson R, et al. Neighborhood environment and marijuana use in urban young adults. Prev Sci. 2015; 16: 268–78. · DOI
- Jelleyman T, Spencer N. Residential mobility in childhood and health outcomes: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008; 62(7): 584–92. · DOI
- Voight A, Shinn M, Nation M. The longitudinal effects of residential mobility on the academic achievement of urban elementary and middle school students. Educ Res. 2008; 41(9): 385–92. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Integrated Public Health Approach to Interpersonal Violence and Suicide Prevention and Response
Decker, M. R., Wilcox, H. C., Holliday, C. N., & Webster, D. W. (2018) · Public Health Reports® · doi:10.1177/0033354918800019 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Self-citationA call to dismantle systemic racism in criminal legal systems.
Najdowski, C. J., & Stevenson, M. C. (2022) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/lhb0000510 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Milam, A. J., Buggs, S. A., Furr-Holden, C. D. M., Leaf, P. J., Bradshaw, C. P., & Webster, D.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Milam, Adam J.
- Venue
- Journal of Urban Health
- Published
- 2016-06-13
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 609-626
- ISSN
- 0028-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-3460
- 1468-2869
- PMC
- PMC4987588
- OpenAlex
- W2422974035
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Urban Health (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1U01CE001954-01A1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Keywords
- gun violence, juvenile homicide, community violence prevention, outreach workers, conflict resolution, urban youth, Baltimore, intervention exposure
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Attitude, Firearms, Homicide, Humans, Male, Public Policy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Safety, Violence, Baltimore, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review