CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22

A validation of AI-enabled discussion platform metrics and relationships to student efforts

Archibald, Audon, Hudson, Cassie, Heap, Tania, Thompson, Ruthanne “Rudi”, Lin, Lin, DeMeritt, Jaqueline, Lucke, Heather·2023·TechTrends
DOI 10.1007/s11528-022-00825-7PMC PMC9862231
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11528-022-00825-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Archibald et al. (2023) showed that an AI-enabled discussion platform accurately calculated students' curiosity scores to present their engagement in discussion, further reducing teachers' assessment workload and facilitating their intervention based on the quality of posts written by students.

    “For instance, Archibald et al. (2023) showed that an AI-enabled discussion platform accurately calculated students' curiosity scores to present their engagement in discussion, further reducing teachers' assessment workload and facilitating their intervention based on the quality of posts written by students.”

    From A systematic review of the early impact of artificial intelligence on higher education curriculum, instruction, and assessment (2025) · cites this paper as Archibald et al. (2023)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Abe, J. A. A. (2020). Big five, linguistic styles, and successful online learning. The Internet and Higher Education,45. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100724 · DOI
  2. Aloni M Harrington C Research based practices for improving the effectiveness of asynchronous online discussion boards Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology 2018 4 4 271 289 10.1037/stl0000121 · DOI
  3. Arbaugh JB Sage, guide, both, or even more? An examination of instructor activity in online MBA courses Computers & Education 2010 55 3 1234 1244 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.020 · DOI
  4. Bartolic, S., Matzat, U., Tai, J., Burgess, J. L., Boud, D., Craig, H., Archibald, A., De Jaeger, A., Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Lutze-Mann, L, Polly, P., Roth, M., Heap, T., Agapito, J., & Guppy, N. (2022). Student vulnerabilities and confidence in learning in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies in Higher Education, 47(12), 2460–2472. 10.1080/03075079.2022.2081679 · DOI
  5. Cheng CK Paré DE Collimore L-M Joordens S Assessing the effectiveness of a voluntary online discussion forum on improving students’ course performance Computers & Education 2011 56 1 253 261 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.024 · DOI
  6. Dahlstrom-Hakki, I., Alstad, Z., & Banerjee, M. (2020). Comparing synchronous and asynchronous online discussions for students with disabilities: The impact of social presence. Computers & Education, 150. 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103842 · DOI
  7. Dennen VP Looking for evidence of learning: Assessment and analysis methods for online discourse Computers in Human Behavior 2008 24 2 205 219 10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.010 · DOI
  8. Ding L Er E Orey M An exploratory study of student engagement in gamified online discussions Computers & Education 2018 120 213 226 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.007 · DOI
  9. E. Gilbert, J. (2021). Equitable AI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–2). Association for Computing Machinery. 10.1145/3411763.3457780 · DOI
  10. Elder L Paul R The role of socratic questioning in thinking, teaching, and learning The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 1998 71 5 297 301 10.1080/00098659809602729 · DOI
  11. Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice (0 ed.). Routledge. 10.4324/9780203166093 · DOI
  12. Heap T Hudson C Archibald A Investigating the impact of an AI-driven discussion platform on educator perceptions and feedback EDEN Conference Proceedings 2020 1 127 136 10.38069/edenconf-2020-ac0010 · DOI
  13. Hudson C Archibald A Heap T Integrating an ai-driven discussion platform: The impact of platform on engagement and quality EDEN Conference Proceedings 2020 1 117 126 10.38069/edenconf-2020-ac0009 · DOI
  14. Hurt, N. E., Moss, G., Bradley, C., Larson, L., Lovelace, M., Prevost, L., Riley, N., Domizi, D., & Camus, M. (2012). The ‘facebook’ effect: College students’ perceptions of online discussions in the age of social networking. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2). 10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060210 · DOI
  15. Indrajit, R. E., & Wibawa, B. (2020). Portrait of higher education in the covid-19 period in a digital literacy perspective: a reflection on the online lecture process experience. In 2020 Fifth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
  16. Knowlton DS A taxonomy of learning through asynchronous discussion Journal of Interactive Learning Research 2005 16 2 155 177
  17. Lantz, J. L., Liu, J. C., & Basnyat, I. (2022). Piloting Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Facilitate Online Discussion in Large Online Classes: A Case Study [Chapter]. Cases on Innovative and Successful Uses of Digital Resources for Online Learning; IGI Global. 10.4018/978-1-7998-9004-1.ch009 · DOI
  18. Lee J-E Recker M The effects of instructors’ use of online discussions strategies on student participation and performance in university online introductory mathematics courses Computers & Education 2021 162 104084 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104084 · DOI
  19. Nedelkoska L Quintini G Automation, skills use and training OECD 2018 10.1787/2e2f4eea-en · DOI
  20. Park JH Schallert DL Sanders AJZ Williams KM Seo E Yu L-T Vogler JS Song K Williamson ZH Knox MC Does it matter if the teacher is there?: A teacher’s contribution to emerging patterns of interactions in online classroom discussions Computers & Education 2015 82 315 328 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.019 · DOI
  21. Peters VL Hewitt J An investigation of student practices in asynchronous computer conferencing courses Computers & Education 2010 54 4 951 961 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.030 · DOI
  22. Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1). 10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8 PMC6294271 30595727 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Rochera, M. J., Engel, A., & Coll, C. (2021). The effects of teacher feedback: a case study of an online discussion forum in Higher Education. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 21(67). 10.6018/red.476901 · DOI
  24. Salter NP Conneely MR Structured and unstructured discussion forums as tools for student engagement Computers in Human Behavior 2015 46 18 25 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.037 · DOI
  25. Schartel SA Giving feedback–An integral part of education Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology 2012 26 1 77 87 10.1016/j.bpa.2012.02.003 22559958 · DOI
  26. Shum SB Sándor Á Goldsmith R Bass R McWilliams M Towards reflective writing analytics: rationale, methodology and preliminary results Journal of Learning Analytics 2017 4 1 58 84 10.18608/jla.2017.41.5 · DOI
  27. Skowronek M Gilberti RM Petro M Sancomb C Maddern S Jankovic J Inclusive STEAM education in diverse disciplines of sustainable energy and AI Energy and AI 2022 7 100124 10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100124 · DOI
  28. Smith, T.W. (2019). Making the Most of Online Discussion: A Retrospective Analysis. The International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31, 21–31.
  29. Stein DS Wanstreet CE Slagle P Trinko LA Lutz M From ‘hello’ to higher-order thinking: The effect of coaching and feedback on online chats The Internet and Higher Education 2013 16 78 84 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.03.001 · DOI
  30. Wang Q Woo HL Comparing asynchronous online discussions and face-to-face discussions in a classroom setting British Journal of Educational Technology 2007 38 2 272 286 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00621.x · DOI
  31. Zydney JM deNoyelles A Kyeong-Ju Seo K Creating a community of inquiry in online environments: An exploratory study on the effect of a protocol on interactions within asynchronous discussions Computers & Education 2012 58 1 77 87 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.009 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Archibald, A., Hudson, C., Heap, T., Thompson, R. “., Lin, L., DeMeritt, J., & Lucke, H.
ORCID
Archibald, Audon
Venue
TechTrends
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2023-01-21
Volume
67
Issue
2
Pages
285-293
ISSN
  • 8756-3894
  • 1559-7075
DOI
10.1007/s11528-022-00825-7
PMC
PMC9862231
Cited by
22
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review