Cited by 4Sentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningArtificial Intelligence in EducationEducational Technology in Learning

Community Perspectives on ChatGPT: Sentiment Analysis in Educational Forum

Lee, Youngjin·2024·TechTrends

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11528-024-01012-6

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, Y.
Affiliations
University of North Texas (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Youngjin
Venue
TechTrends
Published
2024-11
Volume
68
Issue
6
Pages
1195-1207
ISSN
  • 1559-7075 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-3894
OpenAlex
W4404198054
Cited by
4
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
TechTrends (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
Keywords
ChatGPT, large language models in education, teacher perceptions, sentiment analysis, topic modeling, plagiarism, academic dishonesty, professional development, student engagement, educational reform

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review