Estimation of Rates of Non-neutral Mutations When Bacteria are Exposed to Subinhibitory Levels of Antibiotics
Abstract
The increasingly widespread use of antibiotics has raised an urgent public health question: how does nonlethal exposure of antibiotics increase rates of bacterial mutations that confer antibiotic resistance? Quantitative studies of this sort are rare, and interested investigators tend to neglect scenarios where the mutation inducer and the selective agent are the same. One possible reason for this puzzling neglect is that such an investigation may lead to results that are prone to a Lamarckian interpretation, but a more tangible reason is that successful estimation of mutation rates in such scenarios requires new computational methods. This study presents computational methods tailored for a mutation model in which some wide-type cells may be killed by nonlethal exposure to an antibiotic, but in which mutants proliferate unimpeded. Methods for computing maximum likelihood estimates of mutation rates and their corresponding confidence intervals are devised and evaluated by simulations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The simulation algorithm that is a part of mlemur combines previously used approaches with the novel addition of phenotypic lag.
“Simulation algorithm that is a part of mlemur combines previously used approaches with the novel addition of phenotypic lag [38,39,46].”
From Efficient, robust, and versatile fluctuation data analysis using MLE MUtation Rate calculator (mlemur) (2023) · cites this paper as [46]
Cites
Cairns, J., Overbaugh, J., & Miller, S. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/335142a0 · Cited by 1,025 · cited 2× · see citing works
“But in certain research communities induced mutations also acquired other designations suggestive of directed mutation as envisioned by Cairns et al. (1988) or of Lamarckian evolution.”
BackgroundAnalysis of the Luria–Delbrück distribution using discrete convolution powers
Ma, W. T., Sandri, G. V., & Sarkar, S. (1992) · Journal of Applied Probability · doi:10.1017/s0021900200043023 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
rSalvador: An R Package for the Fluctuation Experiment
Zheng, Q. (2017) · G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.117.300120 · Cited by 98 · cited 4× · see citing works
“This is not surprising, because the recursive algorithm proposed by Ma et al. (1992) is an efficient way to compute pk for k < 5000, when properly implemented (Zheng 2017).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Łazowski, K. (2023) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2023.111816 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zheng, Q.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zheng, Qi
- ORCID
- Zheng, Qi
- Venue
- Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
- Published
- 2022-09-30
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 131-131
- ISSN
- 0092-8240 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-9602
- OpenAlex
- W4298086671
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bulletin of Mathematical Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
- Keywords
- mutation rate, antibiotic resistance, subinhibitory antibiotic exposure, bacterial mutation, maximum likelihood estimation, confidence intervals, mutation-selection balance
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacteria, Models, Biological, Mutation, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Mathematical Concepts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review