Cited by 17Radiation Dose and ImagingRadiology practices and educationAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Practical recommendations for the application of DE 59/2013

Open access
Torresin, Alberto, Evans, Stephen, Lizio, Domenico, Pierotti, Luisa, Stasi, Michele, Salerno, Sergio·2019·La radiologia medica

Abstract

The changes introduced with Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom will require European Member States adapt their regulations, procedures and equipment to the new high standards of radiation safety. These new requirements will have an impact, in particular, on the radiology community (including medical physics experts) and on industry. Relevant changes include new definitions, a new dose limit for the eye lens, non-medical imaging exposures, procedures in asymptomatic individuals, the use and regular review of diagnostic reference levels (including interventional procedures), dosimetric information in imaging systems and its transfer to the examination report, new requirements on responsibilities, the registry and analysis of accidental or unintended exposure and population dose evaluation (based on age and gender distribution). Furthermore, the Directive emphasises the need for justification of medical exposure (including asymptomatic individuals), introduces requirements concerning patient information and strengthens those for recording and reporting doses from radiological procedures, the use of diagnostic reference levels, the availability of dose-indicating devices and the improved role and support of the medical physics experts in imaging.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11547-019-01031-x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Torresin, A., Evans, S., Lizio, D., Pierotti, L., Stasi, M., & Salerno, S.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT)
  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT)
  • A. O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino (IT)
  • University of Palermo (IT)
Corresponding author
Torresin, Alberto
Venue
La radiologia medica
Published
2019-04-05
Volume
124
Issue
8
Pages
721-727
ISSN
  • 0033-8362 (ISSN-L)
  • 1826-6983
OpenAlex
W2928115573
Cited by
17
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • La radiologia medica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Keywords
radiation protection, radiology, diagnostic reference levels, justification of medical exposure, patient information, dose reporting, medical physics, interventional radiology
MeSH terms
Radiation Exposure, Emergencies, European Union, Health Physics, Humans, Lens, Crystalline, Radiation Dosage, Radiation Protection, Radiology, Reference Standards, Safety, Occupational Exposure, Asymptomatic Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review