Endoscopic Navigation in the Clinic: Registration in the Absence of Preoperative Imaging
Abstract
Purpose Clinical examinations that involve endoscopic exploration of the nasal cavity and sinuses often do not have a reference preoperative image, like a computed tomography (CT) scan, to provide structural context to the clinician. The aim of this work is to provide structural context during clinical exploration without requiring additional CT acquisition. Methods We present a method for registration during clinical endoscopy in the absence of CT scans by making use of shape statistics from past CT scans. Using a deformable registration algorithm that uses these shape statistics along with dense point clouds from video, we simultaneously achieve two goals: (1) register the statistically mean shape of the target anatomy with the video point cloud, and (2) estimate patient shape by deforming the mean shape to fit the video point cloud. Finally, we use statistical tests to assign confidence to the computed registration. Results We are able to achieve submillimeter errors in registrations and patient shape reconstructions using simulated data. We establish and evaluate the confidence criteria for our registrations using simulated data. Finally, we evaluate our registration method on in vivo clinical data and assign confidence to these registrations using the criteria established in simulation. All registrations that are not rejected by our criteria produce submillimeter residual errors. Conclusion Our deformable registration method can produce submillimeter registrations and re…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Quantifying uncertainty in registration slowly emerges as a research thrust in 2D/2D and 3D/3D registration.
“Quantifying uncertainty in registration slowly emerges as a research thrust in 2D/2D and 3D/3D registration”
From The Impact of Machine Learning on 2D/3D Registration for Image-Guided Interventions: A Systematic Review and Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Sinha et al., 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Unberath, M., Gao, C., Hu, Y., Judish, M., Taylor, R. H., Armand, M., & Grupp, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.716007 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
“Quantifying uncertainty in registration slowly emerges as a research thrust in 2D/2D and 3D/3D registration [91, 92].”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Sinha, A., Ishii, M., Hager, G. D., & Taylor, R. H.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sinha, Ayushi
- Venue
- International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
- Published
- 2019-05-31
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1495-1506
- ISSN
- 1861-6410 (ISSN-L)
- 1861-6429
- OpenAlex
- W2947459843
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (NIH R01- EB015530)
- Office of the Provost, Johns Hopkins University (Provost’s Postdoctoral Fellowship)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
- Keywords
- endoscopic navigation, deformable image registration, nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, shape statistics, mean shape
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Endoscopy, Head, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Video Recording, Models, Statistical, Preoperative Period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review