Cited by 9Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAnatomy and Medical Technology3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

Endoscopic Navigation in the Clinic: Registration in the Absence of Preoperative Imaging

Sinha, Ayushi, Ishii, Masaru, Hager, Gregory D., Taylor, Russell H.·2019·International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Abstract

Purpose Clinical examinations that involve endoscopic exploration of the nasal cavity and sinuses often do not have a reference preoperative image, like a computed tomography (CT) scan, to provide structural context to the clinician. The aim of this work is to provide structural context during clinical exploration without requiring additional CT acquisition. Methods We present a method for registration during clinical endoscopy in the absence of CT scans by making use of shape statistics from past CT scans. Using a deformable registration algorithm that uses these shape statistics along with dense point clouds from video, we simultaneously achieve two goals: (1) register the statistically mean shape of the target anatomy with the video point cloud, and (2) estimate patient shape by deforming the mean shape to fit the video point cloud. Finally, we use statistical tests to assign confidence to the computed registration. Results We are able to achieve submillimeter errors in registrations and patient shape reconstructions using simulated data. We establish and evaluate the confidence criteria for our registrations using simulated data. Finally, we evaluate our registration method on in vivo clinical data and assign confidence to these registrations using the criteria established in simulation. All registrations that are not rejected by our criteria produce submillimeter residual errors. Conclusion Our deformable registration method can produce submillimeter registrations and re…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11548-019-02005-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sinha, A., Ishii, M., Hager, G. D., & Taylor, R. H.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Sinha, Ayushi
Venue
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
Published
2019-05-31
Volume
14
Issue
9
Pages
1495-1506
ISSN
  • 1861-6410 (ISSN-L)
  • 1861-6429
OpenAlex
W2947459843
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (NIH R01- EB015530)
  • Office of the Provost, Johns Hopkins University (Provost’s Postdoctoral Fellowship)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Keywords
endoscopic navigation, deformable image registration, nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, shape statistics, mean shape
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Endoscopy, Head, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Video Recording, Models, Statistical, Preoperative Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review