Internet Self-Diagnosis in Hand Surgery
Open accessAbstract
Background: Some Internet sites have programs that attempt to help patients find their diagnosis based on symptoms. This study tested the null hypothesis that there are no factors associated with correspondence between online diagnosis and the hand surgeon's diagnosis in an outpatient hand and upper extremity surgeons' office. Methods: Eighty-six outpatients were prospectively enrolled and used WebMD® symptom checker to guess their diagnosis. We collected demographic information, hours spent on the Internet per week, and the following questionnaires: Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and Center of Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (C-ESD). Results: Thirty-three percent of online diagnoses matched the final diagnosis of the hand surgeon. Factors associated with an online diagnosis corresponding to the hand surgeon's diagnosis included sex (women) and patients who studied their symptoms online prior to the visit. The best multivariable model included sex, more years of education, and prior use of the Internet to research their medical condition and explained 15 % of the variation in correspondence of diagnosis. Conclusions: The majority of online diagnoses for hand and upper extremity conditions do not correspond with the diagnosis of the treating hand surgeon. Psychological factors do not influence the correspondence of online diagnosis with the hand surgeon's diagnosis. Level of Evidence: Prognostic, level II
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Almost 50% of outpatients presenting to hand surgery clinics investigated their symptoms online.
“Hagemen et al [52] reported that almost 50% of outpatients presenting to hand surgery clinics investigated their symptoms online, which increases the potential to deliver evidence-based pain management and coping skills for HULI online.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Hageman, M. G. J. S., Anderson, J., Blok, R., Bossen, J. K. J., & Ring, D.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hageman, Michiel G. J. S.
- Anderson, Jade
- Blok, Robin
- Bossen, Jeroen K. J.
- Ring, David
- Venue
- HAND
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-12-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 565-569
- ISSN
- 1558-9447 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9455
- PMC
- PMC4551618
- OpenAlex
- W1986464667
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Hand (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- symptom checkers, WebMD, hand surgery, diagnostic accuracy, sex differences, pain catastrophizing, depression, patient education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review