Cited by 26Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

Internet Self-Diagnosis in Hand Surgery

Open access
Hageman, Michiel G. J. S., Anderson, Jade, Blok, Robin, Bossen, Jeroen K. J., Ring, David·2015·HAND

Abstract

Background: Some Internet sites have programs that attempt to help patients find their diagnosis based on symptoms. This study tested the null hypothesis that there are no factors associated with correspondence between online diagnosis and the hand surgeon's diagnosis in an outpatient hand and upper extremity surgeons' office. Methods: Eighty-six outpatients were prospectively enrolled and used WebMD® symptom checker to guess their diagnosis. We collected demographic information, hours spent on the Internet per week, and the following questionnaires: Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and Center of Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (C-ESD). Results: Thirty-three percent of online diagnoses matched the final diagnosis of the hand surgeon. Factors associated with an online diagnosis corresponding to the hand surgeon's diagnosis included sex (women) and patients who studied their symptoms online prior to the visit. The best multivariable model included sex, more years of education, and prior use of the Internet to research their medical condition and explained 15 % of the variation in correspondence of diagnosis. Conclusions: The majority of online diagnoses for hand and upper extremity conditions do not correspond with the diagnosis of the treating hand surgeon. Psychological factors do not influence the correspondence of online diagnosis with the hand surgeon's diagnosis. Level of Evidence: Prognostic, level II

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11552-014-9707-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 26

Authors
Hageman, M. G. J. S., Anderson, J., Blok, R., Bossen, J. K. J., & Ring, D.
Affiliations
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hageman, Michiel G. J. S.
  • Anderson, Jade
  • Blok, Robin
  • Bossen, Jeroen K. J.
  • Ring, David
Venue
HAND
Published
2014-12-02
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
565-569
ISSN
  • 1558-9447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9455
OpenAlex
W1986464667
Cited by
26
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hand (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Keywords
symptom checkers, WebMD, hand surgery, diagnostic accuracy, sex differences, pain catastrophizing, depression, patient education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review