Synchronization of neuron population subject to steady DC electric field induced by magnetic stimulation
Open accessAbstract
Electric fields, which are ubiquitous in the context of neurons, are induced either by external electromagnetic fields or by endogenous electric activities. Clinical evidences point out that magnetic stimulation can induce an electric field that modulates rhythmic activity of special brain tissue, which are associated with most brain functions, including normal and pathological physiological mechanisms. Recently, the studies about the relationship between clinical treatment for psychiatric disorders and magnetic stimulation have been investigated extensively. However, further development of these techniques is limited due to the lack of understanding of the underlying mechanisms supporting the interaction between the electric field induced by magnetic stimulus and brain tissue. In this paper, the effects of steady DC electric field induced by magnetic stimulation on the coherence of an interneuronal network are investigated. Different behaviors have been observed in the network with different topologies (i.e., random and small-world network, modular network). It is found that the coherence displays a peak or a plateau when the induced electric field varies between the parameter range we defined. The coherence of the neuronal systems depends extensively on the network structure and parameters. All these parameters play a key role in determining the range for the induced electric field to synchronize network activities. The presented results could have important implications for the scientific theoretical studies regarding the effects of magnetic stimulation on human brain.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
According to theoretical and computational models, billions of brains immersed in Earth's geomagnetic field may generate a secondary, 'transcerebral' field, capable of storing and transmitting collective information, normalizing interneuronal coherence and thus scaling synchronization from neural networks to planetary systems.
“According to theoretical and computational models, billions of brains immersed in Earth’s geomagnetic field may generate a secondary, “transcerebral” field, capable of storing and transmitting collective information, normalizing interneuronal coherence and thus scaling synchronization from neural networks to planetary systems [30,97,98,99].”
From The Heart’s Electromagnetic Field in Emotions, Empathy and Human Connection: Biosensor-Derived Insights into Heart–Brain Axis Mechanisms and a Basis for Novel BioMagnetoTherapies (2026) · cites this paper as [30]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPhase-synchronization and ion cyclotron resonance mechanisms do not apply to the heart's extremely weak magnetic field.
“Though several mechanisms have been proposed for explaining EMF interactions with biological systems, including phase-synchronization [30,31] and ion cylcotron resonance [32], these frameworks do not apply for the heart’s extremely weak magnetic field.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 94 · Cited by 17
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Wang R, Zhang Z, Chen G (2008b) Energy function and energy evolution on neural population. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 19(3):535-538
- Authors
- Yu, K., Wang, J., Deng, B., & Wei, X.
- Affiliations
- Tianjin University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yu, Kai
- Venue
- Cognitive Neurodynamics
- Published
- 2012-12-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 237-252
- ISSN
- 1871-4080 (ISSN-L)
- 1871-4099
- PMC
- PMC3654152
- OpenAlex
- W2063143590
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Cognitive Neurodynamics (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61072012, 60901035, 50907044)
- Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists of Shanxi Province
- Young Scientists Fund (50907044, 60901035, 61072012)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
- Keywords
- magnetic stimulation, DC electric field, neuronal synchronization, interneuronal networks, network coherence, small-world networks, modular networks, random networks, network topology, brain electrical activity, neuromodulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review