Cited by 61EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

Functional and effective connectivity based features of EEG signals for object recognition

Open access
Tafreshi, Taban Fami, Daliri, Mohammad Reza, Ghodousi, Mahrad·2019·Cognitive Neurodynamics

Abstract

Classifying different object categories is one of the most important aims of brain-computer interface researches. Recently, interactions between brain regions were studied using different methods, such as functional and effective connectivity techniques. Functional and effective connectivity techniques are applied to estimate human brain areas connectivity. The main purpose of this study is to compare classification accuracy of the most advanced functional and effective methods in order to classify 12 basic object categories using Electroencephalography (EEG) signals. In this paper, 19 channels EEG signals were collected from 10 healthy subjects; when they were visiting color images and instructed to select the target images among others. Correlation, magnitude square coherence, wavelet coherence (WC), phase synchronization and mutual information were applied to estimate functional cortical connectivity. On the other hand, directed transfer function, partial directed coherence, generalized partial directed coherence (GPDC) were used to obtain effective cortical connectivity. After feature extraction, the scalar feature selection methods including T-test and one-sided-anova were applied to rank and select the most informative features. The selected features were classified by a one-against-one support vector machine classifier. The results indicated that the use of different techniques led to different classifying accuracy and brain lobes analysis. WC and GPDC are the most acc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11571-019-09556-7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tafreshi, T. F., Daliri, M. R., & Ghodousi, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Tehran (IR)
  • Iran University of Science and Technology (IR)
  • Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Daliri, Mohammad Reza
Venue
Cognitive Neurodynamics
Published
2019-10-01
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
555-566
ISSN
  • 1871-4080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1871-4099
OpenAlex
W2978138478
Cited by
61
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Neurodynamics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
object recognition, EEG, functional connectivity, effective connectivity, brain-computer interface, wavelet coherence, generalized partial directed coherence, partial directed coherence, directed transfer function, mutual information, phase synchronization, feature selection, support vector machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review