Cited by 1EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEmotion and Mood RecognitionGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

Domain generalized feature embedded learning for calibration-free event-related potentials recognition.

Open access
Luo, Tian-jian·2026·Cognitive Neurodynamics

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) play an important role for building EEG-based brain computer interfaces (BCIs). However, due to the complex and varied spatio-temporal characteristics of ERPs across subjects, data distribution across subjects a very important issue to be solved for constructing calibration-free BCIs. To achieve calibration-free ERPs recognition, we propose a D omain G eneralized F eature E mbedded L earning (DGFEL) method. First, we align the ERPs of each existed subject based on covariance centroids. Then, we enhanced the aligned samples based on xDAWN filter and extract spatio-temporal features. Finally, the spatio-temporal features are further generalized by the decomposed adversarial loss, and we construct a neural network embedding backbone to implement features generalization across subjects. The proposed method has been systematically validated on two benchmark EEG-based ERP datasets, and its classification performance surpasses several state-of-the-art methods as well as deep learning models. Moreover, it effectively captures robust features from existed source subjects, and can be generalized to new subjects without accessing target ERP samples. Our method therefore provides a novel selection to construct calibration-free ERP-BCIs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11571-026-10450-2

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Domain adaptation and domain generalization methods address cross-subject distribution shift in ERP-based BCIs but are not designed for interpretability.

    “Domain adaptation and domain generalization methods address cross-subject distribution shift in ERP-based BCIs [20], [21], [22], but are not designed for interpretability.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luo, T.-J.
Affiliations
Fujian Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Luo, Tian-jian
Venue
Cognitive Neurodynamics
Published
2026-04-09
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
77-77
ISSN
  • 1871-4080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1871-4099
OpenAlex
W7152588646
Cited by
0
References
2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Neurodynamics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62106049)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2022J01655)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Keywords
event-related potentials, EEG, domain generalization, spatiotemporal feature extraction, adversarial loss, cross-subject generalization, feature embedding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review