The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Doctors and Patients Discuss Routine Clinical Decisions: Informed Decision Making in the Outpatient Setting
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of Biomedical Ethics
(2012) · Thieves of Virtue · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9079.003.0009 · Cited by 13,453
Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature
Ong, L. M. L., de Haes, J. C. J. M., Hoos, A. M., & Lammes, F. B. (1995) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)00155-m · Cited by 2,430
A history and theory of informed consent
Kapp, M. B. (1986) · Journal of Legal Medicine · doi:10.1080/01947648609513478 · Cited by 2,331
From the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Loeb, J. M. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.275.7.508 · Cited by 1,534
The Silent World of Doctor and Patient
Katz, J. (2002) · Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks · doi:10.56021/9780801857805 · Cited by 992
Do Patients Want to Participate in Medical Decision Making?
Strull, W. M. (1984) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1984.03350210038026 · Cited by 774
Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice
Appelbaum, P. S., Lidz, C. W., & Meisel, A. (1987) · eScholarship@UMassChan · Cited by 733
What Role Do Patients Wish to Play in Treatment Decision Making?
Deber, R. B. (1996) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.156.13.1414 · Cited by 627
A review of the validity and accuracy of self-assessments in health professions training
Gordon, M. J. (1991) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199112000-00012 · Cited by 531
Levinson, W., & Roter, D. (1993) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf02600146 · Cited by 304
Self-citation
Cited by
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Lewis, K., Barry, M. J., Bennett, C. L., Eden, K. B., Holmes-Rovner, M., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Lyddiatt, A., Thomson, R., et al. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001431.pub5 · Cited by 6,685
Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice
Elwyn, G., Frosch, D., Thomson, R., Joseph-Williams, N., Lloyd, A., Kinnersley, P., Cording, E., Tomson, D., Dodd, C., Rollnick, S., et al. (2012) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6 · Cited by 4,405
An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters
Makoul, G., & Clayman, M. L. (2006) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.010 · Cited by 1,621
(2005) · PubMed · Cited by 562
Feudtner, C. (2007) · Pediatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2007.07.008 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Braddock, C. H., Fihn, S. D., Levinson, W., Jonsen, A. R., & Pearlman, R. A.
- Venue
- Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 339-345
- ISSN
- 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-1497
- OpenAlex
- W2051496061
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 15.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Doctors and Patients Discuss Routine Clinical Decisions: Informed Decision Making in the Outpatient Setting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11606-006-5081-x
- The paper
- Braddock, C. H., Fihn, S. D., Levinson, W., Jonsen, A. R., & Pearlman, R. A. (1997). How Doctors and Patients Discuss Routine Clinical Decisions: Informed Decision Making in the Outpatient Setting. Journal of General Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-5081-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
