Cited by 129Obesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, DietPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Perceived Barriers to Weight Management in Primary Care—Perspectives of Patients and Providers

Open access
Ruelaz, Alicia R., Diefenbach, Pamela, Simon, Barbara, Lanto, Andy, Arterburn, David, Shekelle, Paul G.·2007·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Despite the consequences of overweight and obesity, effective weight management is not occurring in primary care.Objective To identify beliefs about obesity that act as barriers to weight management in primary care by surveying both patients and providers and comparing their responses.Design Anonymous, cross-sectional, self-administered survey of patients and providers of a Veteran's Administration Primary Care Clinic, distributed at the clinic site.Subjects Forty-eight Internal Medicine providers and 488 patients.Measurements Beliefs, attitudes, and experiences with weight management as well as demographic characteristics were collected through a questionnaire.Results Providers and patients differed significantly on many beliefs about weight. Providers were more likely than patients to perceive that patients lack self-control to stay on a diet and that fattening food in society and lack of time for exercise were prime factors in weight gain. They also expressed more interest in helping patients with weight management than patients desiring this. Patients were more likely to state that weight problems should be managed on one's own, talking to a provider is not helpful, providers blame them for their weight problem, and that appointments contain sufficient time for weight discussion.Conclusion Providers and patients emphasize different barriers to weight management. Providers need to be aware of the beliefs that their patients hold to improve weight management discussions and interventions in primary care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-007-0125-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Insufficient time, lack of knowledge, training or confidence and inadequate materials are major barriers to health professionals giving weight loss advice.

    “with insufficient time, lack of knowledge, training or confidence and inadequate materials reported to be major barriers.12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18”

    From A brief intervention for weight control based on habit-formation theory delivered through primary care: results from a randomised controlled trial (2017) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Results and Discussion report that providers perceived insufficient time during routine primary-care appointments as a barrier to discussing weight management. The Introduction also reports physicians’ negative views of their ability to manage weight, which partly supports the confidence point. Our copy does not identify lack of knowledge, training, or inadequate materials as barriers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many providers say they omit the last 3 A's because they perceive them as time consuming and feel they lack the needed counseling skills.

    “Many providers say they omit the last 3 A’s because they perceive them as time consuming and feel they lack the needed counseling skills.52,53”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 129

Authors
Ruelaz, A. R., Diefenbach, P., Simon, B., Lanto, A., Arterburn, D., & Shekelle, P. G.
Affiliations
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (US)
  • Group Health Cooperative (US)
Corresponding author
Ruelaz, Alicia R.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2007-01-30
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
518-522
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2015737566
Cited by
129
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
17.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
weight management, obesity, barriers to weight loss, primary care, patient perspectives, provider perceptions, self-control, dietary adherence, physical activity, veterans
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attitude of Health Personnel, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Perception, Physician-Patient Relations, Primary Health Care, Weight Loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review