Cited by 133Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareCultural Competency in Health CareDiversity and Career in Medicine

Patient–Provider and Patient–Staff Racial Concordance and Perceptions of Mistreatment in the Health Care Setting

Open access
Blanchard, Janice, Nayar, Shakti, Lurie, Nicole·2007·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Objectives To determine what roles patient-provider and patient-staff racial concordance play on patients' perceptions within the health care setting. Design, setting, participants Data from the Commonwealth Fund 2001 Quality of Care telephone survey. Analysis focused on the subsample of 6,066 adults who live in the continental United States and who reported having a regular provider or a usual source of care (n = 4,762). Measurements and results We analyzed patients' responses about perceptions of disrespect, unfair treatment because of race and language, and the belief that he/she would have received better treatment if he/she belonged to a different race. We compared these perceptions of mistreatment with provider and staff racial concordance, controlling for sociodemographic variables. Contrary to our hypothesis, Hispanics were more likely to report being treated with disrespect if in a concordant relationship with their provider than if in a nonconcordant one (odds ratio [OR] 2.42, P < .01). Asians were less likely to report being treated unfairly because of race if in racially concordant relationships with providers than if in nonconcordant ones (P < .05). Hispanics were also less likely to perceive unfair treatment because of language when in concordant relationships with staff as compared to nonconcordant relationships with staff (P < .05). Conclusions Patients' perceptions of health care relationships may partially depend on racial concordance with providers and staff. The nature of the association between racial concordance and perceived disrespect varies by racial group, indicating that other race-specific factors may also need to be examined.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-007-0210-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients' experience of health care is affected by perceived discrimination, resulting in distrust in the provider and, potentially, racial concordance with providers.

    “Patients' experience of health care is also affected by perceived discrimination, resulting distrust in the provider, and, potentially, racial concordance with providers [47-51].”

    From Prevalence of cardiovascular disease among Asian, Pacific Islander and multi-race populations in Hawai’i and California (2023) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Methods section measures perceived race-based unfair treatment, and the Results and Discussion associate racial concordance with perceptions of mistreatment, with findings that vary by racial group. The paper does not report that perceived discrimination causes distrust in providers or leads patients to seek racially concordant providers. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 133

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, eds. Institute of Medicine Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care, Board on Health Sciences Policy. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2002.
  2. East MA, Peterson ED. Understanding racial differences in cardiovas- cular care and outcomes: issues for the new millennium. Am Heart J. 2000;139:764-6.
  3. Barnett E, Halverson J. Disparities in premature coronary heart disease mortality by region and urbanicity among black and white adults ages 35-64, 1985-1995. Public Health Rep. 2000;115:52-64.
  4. Blanchard J, Lurie N. R-E-S-P-E-C-T: patient reports of disrespect in the health care setting and its impact on care. J Fam Pract. 2004;53 (9):721-30.
  5. LaVeist TA, Nuru-Jeter A, Jones KE. The association of doctor-patient race concordance with health services utilization. J Public Health Policy. 2003;24(3-4):312-23.
  6. Cooper-Patrick L, Gallo JJ, Gonzales JJ, et al. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 1999;282 (6):583-9.
  7. Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Gandex B, Rogers WH, Ware JE. Character- istics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:497-504.
  8. Putnam SM, Stiles WB, Jacob MC, James SA. Patient exposition and physician explanation in initial medical interviews and outcomes of clinical visits. Med Care. 1985;23:74-83.
  9. Saha S, Taggart SH, Komaromy M, Bindman AB. Do patients choose physicians of their own race? Health Aff. 2000;19(4):76-83.
  10. Saha S, Komaromy M, Koepsell TD, Bindman AB. Patient-physician racial concordance and the perceived quality and use of health care. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(9):997-1004.
  11. LaVeist TA, Carroll T. Race of physician and satisfaction with care among African-American patients. J Natl Med Assoc. 2002;94(11):937-43.
  12. LaVeist TA, Nuru-Jeter A. Is doctor-patient race concordance associat- ed with greater satisfaction with care? J Health Soc Behav. 2002;43 (3):296-306.
  13. Garcia JA, Paterniti DA, Romano PS, Kravitz RL. Patient preferences for physician characteristics in university-based primary care clinics. Ethn Dis. 2003;13(2):259-67.
  14. Malat J, Van Ryn M. African-American preference for same-race healthcare providers: the role of healthcare discrimination. Ethn Dis. 2005;15(4):740-47.
  15. Gray B, Stoddard J. Patient-physician pairing: does racial and ethnic congruity influence selection of a regular physician. J Commun Health. 1997;22(4):247-59.
  16. Cohen JJ. The consequences of premature abandonment of affirmative action in medical school admissions. JAMA. 2003;289:1143-9.
  17. Lieu TA, Finkelstein JA, Lozano P, et al. Cultural competence policies and other predictors of asthma care quality for Medicaid-insured children. Pediatrics. 2004;114(1):e102-10.
  18. Flores G, Gee D, Kastner B. The teaching of cultural issues in U. S. and Canadian medical schools. Acad Med. 2000;75:451-5.
  19. Pena DE, Munoz C, Grumbach K. Cross-cultural education in U.S. medical schools: development of an assessment tool. Acad Med. 2003;78:615-22.
  20. Ferguson WJ, Keller DM, Haley HL, Quirk M. Developing culturally competent community faculty: a model program. JAMA. 2003;78:1221-8.
  21. Hampers LC, McNulty JE. Professional interpreters and bilingual physicians in a pediatric emergency department: effect on resource utilization. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:1108-13.

Authors
Blanchard, J., Nayar, S., & Lurie, N.
Affiliations
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Blanchard, Janice
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2007-05-08
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
1184-1189
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2012672783
Cited by
133
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Commonwealth Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
racial concordance, patient-provider relationship, patient-staff relationships, racism in healthcare, language barriers, Hispanic patients, Asian patients, usual source of care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Asian, Black or African American, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Prejudice, Professional-Patient Relations, Quality of Health Care, Social Perception, Socioeconomic Factors, Patient Satisfaction, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review