Cited by 100Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Cost-effectiveness of long-term outpatient buprenorphine-naloxone treatment for opioid dependence in primary care.

Open access
Schackman, Bruce R., Leff, Jared A., Polsky, Daniel, Moore, Brent A., Fiellin, David A.·2012·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Primary care physicians with appropriate training may prescribe buprenorphine-naloxone (bup/nx) to treat opioid dependence in US office-based settings, where many patients prefer to be treated. Bup/nx is off patent but not available as a generic.Objective We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of long-term office-based bup/nx treatment for clinically stable opioid-dependent patients compared to no treatment.Design, subjects, and intervention A decision analytic model simulated a hypothetical cohort of clinically stable opioid-dependent individuals who have already completed 6 months of office-based bup/nx treatment. Data were from a published cohort study that collected treatment retention, opioid use, and costs for this population, and published quality-of-life weights. Uncertainties in estimated monthly costs and quality-of-life weights were evaluated in probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and the economic value of additional research to reduce these uncertainties was also evaluated.Main measures Bup/nx, provider, and patient costs in 2010 US dollars, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness (CE) ratios ($/QALY); costs and QALYs are discounted at 3% annually.Key results In the base case, office-based bup/nx for clinically stable patients has a CE ratio of $35,100/QALY compared to no treatment after 24 months, with 64% probability of being < $100,000/QALY in probabilistic sensitivity analysis. With a 50% bup/nx price reduction the CE ratio is $23,000/QALY with 69% probability of being < $100,000/QALY. Alternative quality-of-life weights result in CE ratios of $138,000/QALY and $90,600/QALY. The value of research to reduce quality-of-life uncertainties for 24-month results is $6,400 per person eligible for treatment at the current bup/nx price and $5,100 per person with a 50% bup/nx price reduction.Conclusions Office-based bup/nx for clinically stable patients may be a cost-effective alternative to no treatment at a threshold of $100,000/QALY depending on assumptions about quality-of-life weights. Additional research about quality-of-life benefits and broader health system and societal cost savings of bup/nx therapy is needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-011-1962-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 100

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Stein MD, Cioe P, Friedmann PD. Buprenorphine retention in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(11):1038-1041.

Authors
Schackman, B. R., Leff, J. A., Polsky, D., Moore, B. A., & Fiellin, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Schackman, Bruce R.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2012-01-04
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
669-676
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2024589428
Cited by
100
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • Yale University
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K01 DA01719, R01DA017221, K01DA022398, R01DA009803, R01 DA0009803)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
opioid use disorder, cost-effectiveness, office-based opioid treatment, outpatient care, primary care, quality-adjusted life years, treatment retention, drug cost reduction, research value, decision-analytic model, opioid use disorder treatment, off-patent drugs, health system costs, quality of life
MeSH terms
Assessment of Medication Adherence, Buprenorphine, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Decision Support Techniques, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Combinations, Humans, Long-Term Care, Naloxone, Narcotic Antagonists, Opioid-Related Disorders, Primary Health Care, Sensitivity and Specificity, United States, Drug Costs, Drug Monitoring, Health Care Costs, Cost of Illness, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Medication Adherence, Opiate Substitution Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review