Cited by 146Cultural Competency in Health CareReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Religious Values and Healthcare Accommodations: Voices from the American Muslim Community

Open access
Padela, Aasim I., Gunter, Katie, Killawi, Amal, Heisler, Michele·2012·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Minority populations receive a lower quality healthcare in part due to the inadequate assessment of, and cultural adaptations to meet, their culturally informed healthcare needs. The seven million American Muslims, while ethnically and racially diverse, share religiously informed healthcare values that influence their expectations of healthcare. There is limited empirical research on this community's preferences for cultural modifications in healthcare delivery. Objective Identify healthcare accommodations requested by American Muslims. Methods Using community-based participatory research (CBPR) methods, we partnered with four community organizations in the Greater Detroit area to design and conduct thirteen focus groups at area mosques serving African American, Arab American, and South Asian American Muslims. Qualitative content analysis utilized a framework team-based approach. Key results Participants reported stigmatization within the healthcare system and voiced the need for culturally competent healthcare providers. In addition, they identified three key healthcare accommodations to address Muslim sensitivities: the provision of (1) gender-concordant care, (2) halal food and (3) a neutral prayer space. Gender concordance was requested based on Islamic conceptions of modesty and privacy. Halal food was deemed to be health-promoting and therefore integral to the healing process. Lastly, a neutral prayer space was requested to ensure security and privacy during worship. Conclusions This study informs efforts to deliver high-quality healthcare to American Muslims in several ways. We note three specific healthcare accommodations requested by this community and the religious values underlying these requests. Healthcare systems can further cultural sensitivity, engender trust, and improve the healthcare experiences of American Muslims by understanding and then attempting to accommodate these values as much as possible.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-011-1965-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The respect of religious freedom has long been considered a basic civil right.

    “The respect of religious freedom has long been considered a basic civil right [63].”

    From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Cultural Competence and Priorities for Healthcare Accommodation sections discuss respect for Muslim patients’ beliefs and requests for religious accommodations. Neither those passages nor searches for religious freedom and civil rights address whether religious freedom has long been considered a basic civil right. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Healthcare. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.
  2. Anonymous. Poor communications, cultural barriers impacting quality of health care for minorities. Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 2002;14(4):11-13.
  3. Anderson LM, Scrimshaw SC, Fullilove MT, Fielding JE, Normand J. Culturally competent healthcare systems: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2003;24(3 Suppl 1):68-79.
  4. Brach C, Fraser I. Can cultural competency reduce racial and ethnic health disparities? A review and conceptual model. Med Care Res Rev. 2000;57(Suppl 1):181-217.
  5. Hassoun RJ. Arab Americans in Michigan. Lansing: Michigan State University Press; 2005.
  6. Kleinman A, Eisenberg L, Good B. Culture, illness, and care: clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research. Ann Intern Med. 1978;88(2):251-8.
  7. Wehbe-Alamah H. Bridging generic and professional care practices for Muslim patients through use of Leininger's culture care modes. Con- temp Nurse. 2008;28(1-2):83-97.
  8. Smedley BD, Smith AY, Nelson AR, eds. Unequal Treatment: Con- fronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2002.
  9. Beine K, Fullerton J, Palinkas L, Anders B. Conceptions of prenatal care among Somali women in San Diego. J Nurse Midwifery. 1995;40(4):376-81.
  10. Simpson J, Carter K. Muslim women's experiences with health care providers in a rural area of the United States. J Transcult Nurs. 2008;19 (1):16-23.
  11. Morioka-Douglas N, Sacks T, Yeo G. Issues in caring for Afghan American elders: insights from literature and a focus group. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2004;19(1):27-40.
  12. Reitmanova S, Gustafson D. "They can't understand it": maternity health and care needs of immigrant Muslim women in St. John's, Newfoundland. Matern Child Health J. 2008;12(1):101-11. ,
  13. Matin M, LeBaron S. Attitudes toward cervical cancer screening among Muslim women: a pilot study. Women Health. 2004;39(3):63- 77.
  14. Luna L. Care and cultural context of Lebanese Muslim immigrants: using Leininger's theory. J Transcult Nurs. 1994;5(2):12-20.
  15. DeShaw P. Use of the emergency department by Somali immigrants and refugees. Minn Med. 2006;89(8):42-5.
  16. Cainkar L. The Impact of 9/11 on Muslims and Arabs in the United States. In: Tirman J, ed. The maze of fear: security and migration after September 11. New York: The New Press; 2004.
  17. Davidson J, Boyer ML, Casey D, Matzel SC, Walden D. Gap analysis of cultural and religious needs of hospitalized patients. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2008;31(2):119-26.
  18. Amer MM, Hood RW. Special issue: part II. Islamic religiosity: measures and mental health. J Muslim Ment Health. 2008;3(1):1-5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Padela, A. I., Gunter, K., Killawi, A., & Heisler, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Padela, Aasim I.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2012-01-04
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
708-715
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2005503220
Cited by
146
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
21.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092926)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
Muslim Americans, religious values, cultural competence, halal food, African American Muslims, mosques
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Health Priorities, Humans, Islam, Male, Michigan, Middle Aged, Minority Groups, Prejudice, Religion and Medicine, Sex Factors, Health Behavior, Focus Groups, Needs Assessment, Cultural Competency, Community-Based Participatory Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review